Bair v. Jacobs Engineering Group Inc. et al
| Nicholas Bair |
| Jacobs Engineering Group Inc, Jacobs Project Management Co. and Jacobs Engineering Group Inc. |
| 1:2023cv01392 |
| September 25, 2023 |
| US District Court for the District of Oregon |
| Mark D Clarke |
| Civil Rights: Employment |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 17, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 15 Amended Complaint . Filed by Nicholas Bair against All Defendants. (Buchal, James) |
Filing 14
ORDER: Granting Motion for Leave to File Amended Complaint #13 ; Granting Motion for Extension of Time #13 . Amended Complaint is due 11/17/2023. Answer is due by 12/11/2023. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Mark D. Clarke. (rsm)
|
| Filing 13 Joint Motion for Leave to File Amended Complaint/Petition , Motion for Extension of Time to File Response to Complaint. Filed by All Defendants. (Gibson, Ryan) |
| Filing 12 Notice of Attorney Substitution: Ryan S. Gibson is substituted as counsel of record in place of Attorney E.A. Meg Barankin and James M. Barrett . Filed by on behalf of All Defendants. (Gibson, Ryan) |
|
Filing 11
ORDER: Granting Motion for Extension of Time to Answer #7 . Answer is due by 10/25/2023. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Mark D. Clarke. (rsm)
|
| Filing 10 Amended Corporate Disclosure Statement . Filed by Jacobs Project Management Co.. (Barrett, James) |
| Filing 9 Amended Corporate Disclosure Statement . Filed by Jacobs Engineering Group Inc., Jacobs Project Management Co.. (Barrett, James) |
| Filing 8 Amended Declaration of Cheryl Rimas in Support of Defendants' Notice of Removal. Filed by Jacobs Engineering Group Inc., Jacobs Project Management Co.. (Related document(s): Notice of Removal,, #1 .) (Barrett, James) |
| Filing 7 Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time to Answer Plaintiff's Complaint Notice of Removal,, #1 . Filed by Jacobs Engineering Group Inc., Jacobs Project Management Co.. (Barrett, James) |
|
Filing 6
Scheduling Order regarding Discovery and Pretrial Scheduling Order, #5 . Consent to Jurisdiction by a Magistrate Judge, if any, is to be filed by 1/24/2024. Dispositive Motions are due by 2/23/2024. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Mark D. Clarke. (jkm)
|
|
Filing 5
Notice of Case Assignment to Magistrate Judge Mark D. Clarke and Discovery and Pretrial Scheduling Order. Discovery is to be completed by 1/24/2024. Joint Alternate Dispute Resolution Report is due by 2/23/2024. Pretrial Order is due by 2/23/2024. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Mark D. Clarke. (jkm)
|
| Filing 4 Corporate Disclosure Statement . Filed by Jacobs Project Management Co.. (Barrett, James) |
| Filing 3 Corporate Disclosure Statement . Filed by Jacobs Engineering Group Inc. (Barrett, James) |
| Filing 2 Declaration of Cheryl Rimas in Support of Defendants' Notice of Removal. Filed by Jacobs Engineering Group Inc, Jacobs Project Management Co.. (Related document(s): Notice of Removal,, #1 .) (Barrett, James) |
| Filing 1 Notice of Removal of Case Number 23CV35452 from Jackson County Circuit Court. Filing Fee in amount of $402 collected. Agency Tracking ID: AORDC-9094381 issued. Filer is subject to the requirements of Fed. R. Civ. P. 7.1.. Filed by Jacobs Engineering Group Inc, Jacobs Project Management Co. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Complaint, #2 Exhibit Summons and Complaint, #3 Exhibit Summons and Complaint, #4 Exhibit State Court Docket, #5 Civil Cover Sheet). (Barrett, James) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Oregon District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
