Quintero et al v. City of Medford et al
| Jonathan Quintero, Austen Letrick and RV Main, LLC |
| City of Medford, Ben Lytle, Ryan Groom and Jackson County |
| 1:2023cv01452 |
| October 5, 2023 |
| US District Court for the District of Oregon |
| Mark D Clarke |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 29, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 22
Scheduling Order regarding Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim #7 , Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim #8 . At the request of counsel, the Oral Argument set for 02/07/2024 at 2:00 PM has been RESET for 2/13/2024 at 02:00PM before Magistrate Judge Mark D. Clarke. The previously provided teleconference information remains the same. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Mark D. Clarke. (rsm)
|
|
Filing 21
Scheduling Order regarding Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim #7 , Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim #8 .Telephonic Oral Argument is set for 2/7/2024 at 02:00PM before Magistrate Judge Mark D. Clarke. Teleconference information to be provided in a separate entry. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Mark D. Clarke. (rsm)
|
| Filing 20 Reply to Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim #8 Oral Argument requested. Filed by City of Medford, Ben Lytle. (Wilson, Alicia) |
| Filing 19 Declaration of Jonathan Quintero . Filed by Austen Letrick, Jonathan Quintero, RV Main, LLC. (Related document(s): Response in Opposition to Motion #18 .) (Jacoby, Kevin) |
| Filing 18 Response in Opposition to Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim #8 Oral Argument requested. Filed by Austen Letrick, Jonathan Quintero, RV Main, LLC. (Jacoby, Kevin) |
| Filing 17 County Defendants' Reply Memorandum in Support of Their Motion to Dismiss. Filed by Ryan Groom, Jackson County. (Related document(s): Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim #7 .) (Pietila, Johan) |
| Filing 16 Response in Opposition to Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim #7 Oral Argument requested. Filed by All Plaintiffs. (Jacoby, Kevin) |
|
Filing 15
Scheduling Order. The telephonic Rule 16 Conference scheduled for 11/01/2023 at 10:00 AM is vacated and will be reset after Motion to Dismiss #7 and Motion to Dismiss #8 are resolved. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Mark D. Clarke. (rsm)
|
|
Filing 14
AMENDED Scheduling Order regarding Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim #7 . Responses to Dispositive Motions are due by 10/27/2023. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Mark D. Clarke. (rsm)
|
|
Filing 13
ORDER: Granting Motion for Extension of Time to File Response #11 to Motion to Dismiss #8 . Response is due by 11/13/2023. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Mark D. Clarke. (rsm)
|
|
Filing 12
ORDER: Granting Motion for Extension of Time to File Response #10 to Motion to Dismiss #7 . Response is due by 10/17/2023. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Mark D. Clarke. (rsm)
|
| Filing 11 Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time to File a Response/Reply to Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim #8 . Filed by All Plaintiffs. (Jacoby, Kevin) |
| Filing 10 Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time to File a Response/Reply to Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim #7 . Filed by All Plaintiffs. (Jacoby, Kevin) |
| Filing 9 Declaration of Alicia Wilson . Filed by City of Medford, Ben Lytle. (Related document(s): Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim #8 .) (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Exhibit D, #5 Exhibit E, #6 Exhibit F, #7 Exhibit G-1, #8 Exhibit G-2, #9 Exhibit G-3, #10 Exhibit G-4, #11 Exhibit G-5, #12 Exhibit G-6, #13 Exhibit G-7) (Wilson, Alicia) |
| Filing 8 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim . Oral Argument requested. Filed by City of Medford, Ben Lytle. (Wilson, Alicia) |
| Filing 7 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim . Filed by Ryan Groom, Jackson County. (Pietila, Johan) |
|
Filing 6
RECORD OF ORDER by Magistrate Judge Mark D. Clarke: SETTING a telephonic Rule 16 Conference for 11/01/2023 at 10:00 AM. Conference call information will be provided in a separate entry. At the time of the Conference, parties should have their calendars available to discuss scheduling matters, including modification of the current case deadlines, joining additional parties and amending the pleadings, dispositive motions, and setting a trial date. The parties shall consult pursuant to FRCP 26(f) regarding a focused and proportional discovery plan prior to the Conference. A written report is not required. However, the parties should be prepared to briefly summarize the issues in the case and give the Court a realistic picture of what discovery needs to be completed. The ultimate goal of the discovery plan shall be "the just, speedy, and inexpensive determination" of the action. FRCP 1. If depositions are anticipated, the parties should confer prior to the Conference and have a firm date for the depositions scheduled prior to the conference. Parties shall confer prior to the Conference and consider whether the case could benefit from a streamlined approach, utilizing limited discovery and early dispositive motions, settlement conference, or an expedited trial date. Finally, if the parties intend to file written consents (these need to be filed separately on the docket by each party and not combined in a Joint Status Report) to a magistrate judge, it would be helpful to do so prior to the Rule 16 Conference, particularly if they want to secure a firm trial date. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Mark D. Clarke. (rsm)
|
| Filing 5 Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(a)(1) Agreement . Filed by Austen Letrick, Jonathan Quintero, RV Main, LLC. (Jacoby, Kevin) |
| Filing 4 Individual Party Consent to Jurisdiction by U.S. Magistrate Judge. |
|
Filing 3
Scheduling Order regarding Discovery and Pretrial Scheduling Order, #2 . Consent to Jurisdiction by a Magistrate Judge, if any, is to be filed by 2/2/2024. Dispositive Motions are due by 3/4/2024. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Mark D. Clarke. (jkm)
|
|
Filing 2
Notice of Case Assignment to Magistrate Judge Mark D. Clarke and Discovery and Pretrial Scheduling Order. Discovery is to be completed by 2/2/2024. Joint Alternate Dispute Resolution Report is due by 3/4/2024. Pretrial Order is due by 3/4/2024. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Mark D. Clarke. (jkm)
|
| Filing 1 Joint Notice of Removal of Case Number 23CV35498 from Jackson County Circuit Court. Filing Fee in amount of $402 collected. Agency Tracking ID: AORDC-9106498 issued.. Filed by Ryan Groom, Jackson County (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Civil Cover Sheet). (Pietila, Johan) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Oregon District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
