Easom v. Mello et al
Warren Edwin Easom |
Maia Mello, Clayton Joseph Lance and Curry County Sheriff's Department |
1:2023cv01489 |
October 10, 2023 |
US District Court for the District of Oregon |
Adrienne Nelson |
Prisoner: Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on November 20, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 4 JUDGMENT: IT IS ORDERED AND ADTIJDGED that this Action is DISMISSED without prejudice to his right to continue litigating Case No. 6:23-cv-01409-AN. Pending motions, if any, are DENIED AS MOOT. Signed on 11/20/2023 by Judge Adrienne Nelson.(Deposited in outgoing mail to pro se party on 11/21/2023.) (dsg) |
Filing 3 ORDER TO DISMISS: IT IS ORDERED that Plaintiff's Complaint #1 is DISMISSED as frivolous. The dismissal is without prejudice to his right to continue litigating Case No. 6:23-cv-01409-AN. Signed on 11/20/2023 by Judge Adrienne Nelson. (Deposited in outgoing mail to pro se party on 11/21/2023.) (dsg) |
Filing Fee in amount of $402.00 collected; Receipt No. 104693 issued. (ljp) |
Filing 2 Notice of Case Assignment: This case is assigned to Judge Adrienne Nelson. (Deposited in outgoing mail to pro se party on 10/11/2023.) (dsg) |
Filing 1 Complaint. (No IFP Filed, No Filing Fee Paid) Jury Trial Requested: No. Filed by Warren Edwin Easom against Curry County Sheriff's Department, Clayton Joseph Lance, Maia Mello (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet). (dsg) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Oregon District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.