Emrit v. The Grammy Awards on CBS
| Ronald Satish Emrit |
| The Grammy Awards on CBS doing business as The Recording Academy/ National Academy of Recording Arts and Sciences (NARAS) |
| 1:2024cv00060 |
| January 9, 2024 |
| US District Court for the District of Oregon |
| Mark D Clarke |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 5, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 8 Notice of Appeal to the 9th Circuit. Related Documents: Opinion and Order,, #4 , #6 . (No IFP Granted and No Fee Paid). Filed by Ronald Satish Emrit. (jkm) |
Filing 7
ORDER referring Complaint #1 , Findings & Recommendation: Complaint #1 should be dismissed #6 to Judge Aiken. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Mark D. Clarke. (Deposited in outgoing mail to pro se party on 02/27/2024.) (rsm)
|
| Filing 6 Findings & Recommendation: Complaint #1 should be dismissed. Please access entire text by document number hyperlink. Objections to the Findings and Recommendation are due by 3/12/2024. Signed on 02/27/2024 by Magistrate Judge Mark D. Clarke. (Deposited in outgoing mail to pro se party on 02/27/2024.) (rsm) |
|
Filing 5
Scheduling Order. Amended Complaint is due 2/16/2024. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Mark D. Clarke.(Deposited in outgoing mail to pro se party on 01/16/2024.) (rsm)
|
|
Filing 4
Opinion and Order: Plaintiff's Complaint #1 is DISMISSED without prejudice and with leave to file an amended complaint within thirty (30) days from the entry of this Order. Plaintiff is advised that failure to file an amended complaint within the allotted time, or failure to cure the deficiencies identified above, will result in the case being dismissed with prejudice. Plaintiff's IFP application #2 is held in abeyance and will be reconsidered upon the filing of an amended complaint. Signed on 01/11/2024 by Magistrate Judge Mark D. Clarke. (Deposited in outgoing mail to pro se party on 01/16/2024.) (rsm)
|
| Filing 3 Notice of Case Assignment: This case is assigned to Magistrate Judge Mark D. Clarke. (Deposited in outgoing mail to pro se party on 1/9/24.) (hm) |
| Filing 2 Application for Leave to Proceed IFP. Filed by Ronald Satish Emrit. (hm) |
| Filing 1 Complaint. Jury Trial Requested: Yes. Filed by Ronald Satish Emrit against The Grammy Awards on CBS (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet). (hm) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Oregon District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Emrit v. The Grammy Awards on CBS | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Ronald Satish Emrit | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: The Grammy Awards on CBS doing business as The Recording Academy/ National Academy of Recording Arts and Sciences (NARAS) | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
