Couvrette v. Foremost Insurance Company Grand Rapids, Michigan
Plaintiff: Joanne Couvrette
Defendant: Foremost Insurance Company Grand Rapids, Michigan
Case Number: 1:2024cv00172
Filed: January 26, 2024
Court: US District Court for the District of Oregon
Presiding Judge: Mark D Clarke
Nature of Suit: Insurance
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Jury Demanded By: Both
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on March 18, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
March 18, 2024 Opinion or Order Filing 11 RECORD OF ORDER by Magistrate Judge Mark D. Clarke: SETTING a telephonic Rule 16 Conference for 05/13/2024 at 10:00 AM Conference call information will be provided in a separate entry. At the time of the Conference, parties should have their calendars available to discuss scheduling matters, including modification of the current case deadlines, joining additional parties and amending the pleadings, dispositive motions, and setting a trial date. The parties shall consult pursuant to FRCP 26(f) regarding a focused and proportional discovery plan prior to the Conference. A written report is not required. However, the parties should be prepared to briefly summarize the issues in the case and give the Court a realistic picture of what discovery needs to be completed. The ultimate goal of the discovery plan shall be "the just, speedy, and inexpensive determination" of the action. FRCP 1. If depositions are anticipated, the parties should confer prior to the Conference and have a firm date for the depositions scheduled prior to the conference. Parties shall confer prior to the Conference and consider whether the case could benefit from a streamlined approach, utilizing limited discovery and early dispositive motions, settlement conference, or an expedited trial date. Finally, if the parties intend to file written consents (these need to be filed separately on the docket by each party and not combined in a Joint Status Report) to a magistrate judge, it would be helpful to do so prior to the Rule 16 Conference, particularly if they want to secure a firm trial date. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Mark D. Clarke. (rsm)
March 14, 2024 Filing 10 Joint Status Report and Proposed Joint Case Management Schedule. Filed by Joanne Couvrette. (Thede, Nicholas)
March 12, 2024 Filing 9 Corporate Disclosure Statement . Filed by Foremost Insurance Company Grand Rapids, Michigan. (Adams, Bryce)
March 12, 2024 Filing 8 Answer to #1 Complaint, with Jury Demand Filer is subject to the requirements of Fed. R. Civ. P. 7.1. Filed by Foremost Insurance Company Grand Rapids, Michigan. (Adams, Bryce)
February 21, 2024 Opinion or Order Filing 7 ORDER: Granting Motion for Extension of Time to Answer #6 . Defendant Foremost Insurance Company Grand Rapids, Michigan has until 3/12/24 to file its responsive pleading. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Mark D. Clarke. (rsm)
February 20, 2024 Filing 6 Stipulated Motion for Extension of Time to Answer . Filed by Foremost Insurance Company Grand Rapids, Michigan. (Adams, Bryce)
February 13, 2024 Filing 5 Return of Service Executed as to Foremost Insurance Company Grand Rapids, Michigan served on 1/30/2024, answer due on 2/20/2024. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Proof of Service) (Thede, Nicholas)
January 26, 2024 Filing 4 Summons Issued Electronically as to Foremost Insurance Company Grand Rapids, Michigan. NOTICE: Counsel shall print and serve the summonses and all documents issued by the Clerk at the time of filing upon all named parties in accordance with Local Rule 3-5. (hm)
January 26, 2024 Opinion or Order Filing 3 Scheduling Order regarding Discovery and Pretrial Scheduling Order, #2 . Consent to Jurisdiction by a Magistrate Judge, if any, is to be filed by 5/28/2024. Dispositive Motions are due by 6/24/2024. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Mark D. Clarke. (hm)
January 26, 2024 Opinion or Order Filing 2 Notice of Case Assignment to Magistrate Judge Mark D. Clarke and Discovery and Pretrial Scheduling Order. NOTICE: Counsel shall print and serve the summonses and all documents issued by the Clerk at the time of filing upon all named parties in accordance with Local Rule 3-5. Discovery is to be completed by 5/28/2024. Joint Alternate Dispute Resolution Report is due by 6/24/2024. Pretrial Order is due by 6/24/2024. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Mark D. Clarke. (hm)
January 26, 2024 Filing 1 Complaint. Filing fee in the amount of $405 collected. Agency Tracking ID: AORDC-9251218 Jury Trial Requested: Yes. Filed by Joanne Couvrette against Joanne Couvrette (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Proposed Summons). (Thede, Nicholas)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Oregon District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Couvrette v. Foremost Insurance Company Grand Rapids, Michigan
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Joanne Couvrette
Represented By: Nicholas A. Thede
Represented By: Kyle A. Sturm
Represented By: Scott Andrew MacLaren
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Foremost Insurance Company Grand Rapids, Michigan
Represented By: Lloyd Bernstein
Represented By: Bryce J.Q. Adams
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?