Bryson v. Klamath County et al
Plaintiff: Brian Bryson
Defendant: Chris Kaber and Klamath County
Case Number: 1:2024cv01160
Filed: July 16, 2024
Court: US District Court for the District of Oregon
Presiding Judge: Mark D Clarke
Nature of Suit: Other Statutory Actions
Cause of Action: 29 U.S.C. ยง 2617 Family and Medical Leave Act Discrimination
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on July 16, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
July 16, 2024 Filing 8 Acceptance/Acknowledgement of Service on Klamath County served on 7/16/2024 Filed by Brian Bryson. (Mitchell, Caitlin)
July 16, 2024 Filing 7 Amended Summons Issued Electronically as to Chris Kaber. NOTICE: Counsel shall print and serve the summonses and all documents issued by the Clerk at the time of filing upon all named parties in accordance with Local Rule 3-5. (hm)
July 16, 2024 Filing 6 Amended Proposed Summons Filed by Brian Bryson. (Mitchell, Caitlin)
July 16, 2024 Filing 5 Summons Issued Electronically as to Chris Kaber. NOTICE: Counsel shall print and serve the summonses and all documents issued by the Clerk at the time of filing upon all named parties in accordance with Local Rule 3-5. (hm)
July 16, 2024 Filing 4 Summons Issued Electronically as to Klamath County. NOTICE: Counsel shall print and serve the summonses and all documents issued by the Clerk at the time of filing upon all named parties in accordance with Local Rule 3-5. (hm)
July 16, 2024 Opinion or Order Filing 3 Scheduling Order regarding Discovery and Pretrial Scheduling Order, #2 . Consent to Jurisdiction by a Magistrate Judge, if any, is to be filed by 11/13/2024. Dispositive Motions are due by 12/13/2024. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Mark D. Clarke. (hm)
July 16, 2024 Opinion or Order Filing 2 Notice of Case Assignment to Magistrate Judge Mark D. Clarke and Discovery and Pretrial Scheduling Order. NOTICE: Counsel shall print and serve the summonses and all documents issued by the Clerk at the time of filing upon all named parties in accordance with Local Rule 3-5. Discovery is to be completed by 11/13/2024. Joint Alternate Dispute Resolution Report is due by 12/13/2024. Pretrial Order is due by 12/13/2024. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Mark D. Clarke. (hm)
July 16, 2024 Filing 1 Complaint. Filing fee in the amount of $405 collected. Agency Tracking ID: AORDC-9493695 Jury Trial Requested: Yes. Filed by Brian Bryson against All Defendants (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Proposed Summons, #3 Proposed Summons). (Mitchell, Caitlin)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Oregon District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Bryson v. Klamath County et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Chris Kaber
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Klamath County
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Brian Bryson
Represented By: Jennifer J. Middleton
Represented By: Caitlin Van Tassel Mitchell
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?