Quimby v. Aveson et al
| Freddie Busby Quimby |
| Keith Aveson and Ashdown Project LLC |
| 2:2008cv01057 |
| September 11, 2008 |
| US District Court for the District of Oregon |
| Pendleton Office |
| Baker |
| Patricia Sullivan |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
13
OPINION & ORDER: Magistrate Judge Patricia Sullivan issued Findings and Recommendation (# 11 ) on February 11, 2009, recommending that defendant Ashdown Project's Motion to Dismiss (# 4 ) be granted. The matter is now before this court pu rsuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l)(B) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b). When, as here, no objections are filed, the court is not required to review the factual or legal conclusions of the Magistrate Judge. See, Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 149 (198 5); United States v. Reyna-Tapia, 328 F.3d 1114, 1121 (9'h Cir. 2003). After review, I agree with Judge Sullivan's Recommendation. There is no legal error. The court adopts Magistrate Judge Sullivan's Findings and Recommendations (# 11 ). Defendant's Motion to Dismiss (# 4 ) is granted.Signed on April 1, 2009 by Judge James A. Redden. (eo)
|
|
Filing
11
FINDINGS & RECOMMENDATION: Ashdowns Motion to Dismiss or in the Alternative for Change of Venue (doc. # 4 ) should be GRANTED. The above Findings and Recommendation will be referred to a United States District Judge for review. Objectio ns, if any, are due February 25, 2009. If no objections are filed, review of the Findings and Recommendation will go under advisement on that date. If objections are filed, a response to the objections is due fourteen days after the date the objections are filed and the review of the Findings and Recommendation will go under advisement on that date. Signed on February 11, 2009 by Patricia Sullivan. (eo)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Oregon District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
