Duncan v. Patine, Inc.

Duncan v. Patine, Inc.

Plaintiff:	William D Duncan
Defendant:	Patine, Inc.
Case Number:	2:2008cv01258
Filed:	October 24, 2008
Court:	US District Court for the District of Oregon
Office:	Pendleton Office
County:	Wallowa
Presiding Judge:	Patricia Sullivan
Nature of Suit:	Contract: Other
Cause of Action:	28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Jury Demanded By:	None

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
May 4, 2009	Filing 27 ORDER: This court ADOPTS the Findings and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Sullivan dated March 11, 2009 in its entirety. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Duncan's Motion to Remand (# 7 ) is granted. This action is remanded to the Wallowa County Circuit Court. Patine's Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction (# 4 ) is denied as moot. Signed on May 4, 2009 by Judge Garr M. King. (eo)
March 11, 2009	Filing 22 FINDINGS & RECOMMENDATION: Duncan's Motion to Remand (# 7 ) should be GRANTED, and this case should be REMANDED to the Wallowa County Circuit Court. Accordingly, all other motions, including, Patine's Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction (# 4 ), should be DENIED as moot. The above Findings and Recommendation will be referred to a United States District Judge for review. Objections, if any, are due March 25, 2009. If no objections are filed, review of the Findings and Recommendation will go under advisement on that date. If objections are filed, a response to the objections is due fourteen days after the date the objections are filed and the review of the Findings and Recommendation will go under advisement on that date.Signed on March 11, 2009 by Patricia Sullivan. (eo)

Date Filed

Document Text

May 4, 2009

Filing 27 ORDER: This court ADOPTS the Findings and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Sullivan dated March 11, 2009 in its entirety. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Duncan's Motion to Remand (# 7 ) is granted. This action is remanded to the Wallowa County Circuit Court. Patine's Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction (# 4 ) is denied as moot. Signed on May 4, 2009 by Judge Garr M. King. (eo)

March 11, 2009

Filing 22 FINDINGS & RECOMMENDATION: Duncan's Motion to Remand (# 7 ) should be GRANTED, and this case should be REMANDED to the Wallowa County Circuit Court. Accordingly, all other motions, including, Patine's Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction (# 4 ), should be DENIED as moot. The above Findings and Recommendation will be referred to a United States District Judge for review. Objections, if any, are due March 25, 2009. If no objections are filed, review of the Findings and Recommendation will go under advisement on that date. If objections are filed, a response to the objections is due fourteen days after the date the objections are filed and the review of the Findings and Recommendation will go under advisement on that date.Signed on March 11, 2009 by Patricia Sullivan. (eo)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Oregon District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Duncan v. Patine, Inc.
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: William D Duncan
Represented By:	Rebecca J. Knapp
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: Patine, Inc.
Represented By:	Todd R. Johnston
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?