Hamilton et al v. Silven, Schmeits and Vaughan P.C. et al
Allen Hamilton and Lois Hamilton |
Silven, Schmeits and Vaughan P.C. and Alan J. Schmeits |
2:2009cv01094 |
September 15, 2009 |
US District Court for the District of Oregon |
Pendleton Office |
Baker |
Patricia Sullivan |
None |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity - Legal Malpractice |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 346 Opinion and Order - Plaintiffs' Motion for Judgment Notwithstanding the Verdict 333 , Plaintiffs' Motion for Attorney's Fees 335 , and Plaintiffs' Motion to Deny Attorney's Fees to Defendants 334 are DENIED. Judgment in favor of Defendants shall be entered forthwith. Plaintiffs shall have 14 days from the date of this Opinion and Order to respond to Defendants' Bill of Costs 340 . Signed on 10/21/2013 by Judge Michael H. Simon. (mja) |
Filing 164 Opinion and Order - Defendants fail to show that there is no disputed issue of material fact relating to their alleged legal malpractice in representing the Hamiltons in a previous lawsuit. Defendants' motion for summary judgment and alternative motion for partial summary judgment 120 are DENIED. Signed on 5/28/2013 by Judge Michael H. Simon. (mja) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Oregon District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.