Rise, Inc. et al v. Malheur County, et al.
Rise Legacy Development, LLC and Rise, Inc. |
Malheur County and Malheur County Planning Commission |
2:2010cv00686 |
June 15, 2010 |
US District Court for the District of Oregon |
Pendleton Office |
Patricia Sullivan |
Civil Rights: Accomodations |
42 U.S.C. ยง 405 Fair Housing Act |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 113 OPINION AND ORDER: Rise's Motion for an Order Certifying Two Issues for Interlocutory Appeal 109 is DENIED. See Opinion and Order for details. Signed on 5/25/2012 by Magistrate Judge Patricia Sullivan. (jtj) |
Filing 108 OPINION AND ORDER: Upon review, I agree with Judge Sullivans recommendation and I ADOPT the F&R 98 as my own opinion. Plaintiffs Motion for Summary Judgment 9 is DENIED. Defendants Motion for Summary Judgment 20 is GRANTED IN PART AND D ENIED IN PART, as follows: defendants motion for summary judgment on plaintiffs reasonable accommodation claims under the FHAA and the ADA is GRANTED; defendants motion for summary judgment on plaintiffs intentional discrimination claims under the FH AA and ADA, based on defendants decision to require that plaintiff apply for a conditional use permit, is GRANTED; and defendants motion for summary judgment on plaintiffs intentional discrimination claims under the FHAA and ADA, based on defendants decision to deny plaintiffs conditional use permit application, is DENIED. Signed on 3/30/12 by Judge Michael W. Mosman. (dls) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Oregon District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.