MacLaughlan et al v. Haselton et al
| Harold MacLaughlan and Rebeca MacLaughlan |
| Governor Ted Kulongoski, Justice W. Michael Gillette, Justice Rex Armstrong, Justice Thomas A. Balmer, Justice Robert D. Durham, Justice Jack Landau, Justice Virginia Linder, Justice Ellen Rosenblum, Chief Justice Paul DeMuniz, Justice Rives Kistler, Justice Rick Haselton and Trial Court Adm. Debbie Slagle |
| 2:2012cv02222 |
| December 9, 2012 |
| US District Court for the District of Oregon |
| Pendleton (2) Office |
| Patricia Sullivan |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
49
ORDER: The Court ADOPTS the Magistrate Judge's Findings and Recommendation 22 . Accordingly, Defendants' motion to dismiss 22 is GRANTED and this action is dismissed with prejudice. (Adopting Findings and Recommendation (40) an d Granting Motion to Dismiss (22) in case 3:12-cv-02213-HU; Adopting Findings and Recommendation (41) and Granting Motion to Dismiss (23) in case 3:12-cv-02221-HU; and, Adopting Findings and Recommendation (45) and Granting Motion to Dismiss (27) in case 2:12-cv-02222-HU.) See 3-page order attached. Signed on 2/4/2014 by Judge Marco A. Hernandez. Signed on 2/4/2014 by Judge Marco A. Hernandez. Associated Cases: 3:12-cv-02213-HU, 2:12-cv-02222-HU, 3:12-cv-02221-HU (mr)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Oregon District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
