Lamb v. Taylor et al
| Lee Gordon Lamb |
| Cpl. Clauser, Jane/John Does 1-9, Steve Franke, Asst. Supt. Security Paul R. Hoeye, Cptn. Lague Iverson, Cptn. D. Pedro and Jeri Taylor |
| 2:2014cv00909 |
| June 5, 2014 |
| U.S. District Court for the District of Oregon |
| Pendleton (2) Office |
| Michael J. McShane |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
95
ORDER: Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment (# 67 ) is allowed. The Clerk of the Court is directed to enter a judgment dismissing this case. Signed on September 8, 2016 by Judge Michael J. McShane. (eo) Copy mailed to plaintiff.
|
|
Filing
54
ORDER: Defendants' Motion for partial summary judgment 21 is allowed. Plaintiff's Claim III is dismissed without prejudice. Plaintiff's Motion to Sever 46 is moot insofar as it seeks to "sever count three" and &q uot;sever Tim Cayton and Holmes from the first two claims." In addition, the motion is unnecessary to "join claims one and two" and otherwise realign defendants. Therefore, the Motion 46 is denied. Plaintiff's "Motion for o ral argument and presentation of exhibits" 47 is denied as moot. Any appeal from this order or judgment dismissing this case would be frivolous and not taken in good faith. Therefore, plaintiff's in forma pauperis status is revoked. Signed on 3/16/15 by Judge Michael J. McShane. (Mailed copy to plaintiff) (dsg)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Oregon District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
