Singh v. Washburn et al
| Rotish V. Singh |
| C. Clarke, S. Franke, M. Gower, G. Hall, P. Hoeye, S. Johnston, S. Lankford, J. Myrick, M.E. Perkins, V. Reynolds, S. Shelton, A. Smith, S. Smith and Sue Washburn |
| 2:2014cv01477 |
| September 16, 2014 |
| US District Court for the District of Oregon |
| Pendleton (2) Office |
| Dennis J. Hubel |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
236
OPINION AND ORDER. For the reasons stated, the Court GRANTS Defendants' motions for summary judgment (ECF Nos. 79 , 109 , 174 ), and DENIES Singh's renewed motions for a court-appointed expert (ECF Nos. 127 , 157 , 223 ). IT IS SO ORDERED. Signed on 11/30/2020 by Magistrate Judge Stacie F. Beckerman. Associated Cases: 2:14-cv-01477-SB, 2:16-cv-01957-SB, 2:17-cv-00829-SB (Mailed to Plaintiff on 12/1/2020.) (gw)
|
|
Filing
55
ORDER: The Court ADOPTS Magistrate Judge Beckerman's Findings and Recommendation 50 and, therefore, DENIES Plaintiff's Motion 40 for Leave to File Supplemental Complaint without prejudice to Plaintiff to pursue his new claims in a separate action. The Court also GRANTS in part and DENIES in part Defendants' Partial Motion 26 to Dismiss Plaintiff's Complaint. Signed on 3/15/2016 by Judge Anna J. Brown. (gw)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Oregon District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
