Wasson v. United States et al
| John M. Wasson |
| Kathleen M. Anders, Ross DeWayne, Chris Helberg, John Mayte, Brett Thomas, United States and Robert Varner |
| 2:2015cv01279 |
| July 10, 2015 |
| US District Court for the District of Oregon |
| Pendleton (2) Office |
| Patricia Sullivan |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
100
ORDER - No party having made objections, this Court follows the recommendation of the Advisory Committee and reviews Judge Sullivan's Findings and Recommendation for clear error on the face of the record. No such error is apparent. Accor dingly, the Court ADOPTS Judge Sullivan's Findings and Recommendation, ECF 97 . The Court DENIES Plaintiff's Petition for Return of Seized Property and Assessment of Damages (ECF 92 ). Signed on 3/22/2021 by Judge Michael H. Simon. (mja)
|
|
Filing
62
ORDER: The Court ADOPTS Magistrate Judge Sullivan's Findings and Recommendation 60 . Accordingly, the Court GRANTS Helberg's Motion 58 to Dismiss and DISMISSES with prejudice Plaintiff's Fifth Amendment Claim against Helberg. Signed on 5/10/17 by Judge Anna J. Brown. (Mailed copy to plaintiff) (dsg)
|
|
Filing
10
Order. The Court REVERSES the Magistrate Judge's Order 4 denying plaintiff's Application 1 to Proceed In Forma Pauperis and GRANTS plaintiff's Application. Signed on 10/14/2015 by Judge Anna J. Brown. (Copy mailed to plaintiff.) (sm)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Oregon District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
