Knight v. Oregon Department of Corrections et al
Knight and Betty L Knight |
Oregon Department of Corrections, Mark Nooth, Judy Gilmore and John 1-10 Does |
2:2016cv00160 |
January 29, 2016 |
US District Court for the District of Oregon |
Pendleton (2) Office |
Patricia Sullivan |
Civil Rights: Other |
42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act |
Both |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on October 5, 2016. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 20 Notice of Settlement Filed by Judy Gilmore, Mark Nooth, Oregon Department of Corrections (Hallman, Andrew) |
Filing 19 60-DAY ORDER OF DISMISSAL: The Court having been informed by counsel for the parties that this action has been settled, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to LR 41-1, this action is dismissed with prejudice and without costs and with leave, upon good cause shown within sixty (60) days, to have this order of dismissal set aside and the action reinstated if the settlement is not consummated. Pending motions, if any, are denied as moot. All pretrial deadlines and any trial date are stricken. By Clerk of Court Mary L. Moran. (dsg) |
Filing 18 MINUTES of Proceedings: Settlement Conference held before Magistrate Judge Stacie F. Beckerman on 10/4/2016. The case settles. Defendants are to file final papers. Dennis Steinman and Scott J. Aldworth present as counsel for plaintiff. Andrew D. Hallman present as counsel for defendants. Court Reporter: None. Tape No.: None. Magistrate Judge Stacie F. Beckerman presiding. (gw) |
|
|
Filing 15 Declaration of Scott J. Aldworth in Support of Unopposed Motion to Extend Discovery Deadlines. Filed by Betty L Knight. (Related document(s): Motion for Extension of Discovery & PTO Deadlines #14 .) (Aldworth, Scott) |
Filing 14 Unopposed Motion for Extension of Discovery & PTO Deadlines to Extend Discovery Deadlines. Filed by Betty L Knight. (Aldworth, Scott) |
|
Filing 12 Declaration of Scott J. Aldworth in Support of Unopposed Motion to Extend Court Imposed Deadlines. Filed by Betty L Knight. (Related document(s): Motion for Extension of Discovery & PTO Deadlines #11 .) (Steinman, Dennis) |
Filing 11 Unopposed Motion for Extension of Discovery & PTO Deadlines . Filed by Betty L Knight. (Steinman, Dennis) |
|
Filing 9 Stipulated Proposed Form of Order Submitted Protective Order. Filed by Betty L Knight. (Steinman, Dennis) |
|
Filing 7 Unopposed Motion for Protective Order . Filed by Betty L Knight. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - proposed Stipulated Protective Order) (Aldworth, Scott) |
Filing 6 Answer to #1 Complaint with Jury Demand and Affirmative Defenses. Filed by Judy Gilmore, Mark Nooth, Oregon Department of Corrections. (Hallman, Andrew) |
Filing 5 Acceptance/Acknowledgement of Service of Complaint #1 Filed by Judy Gilmore, Mark Nooth, Oregon Department of Corrections. (Hallman, Andrew) |
Filing 4 Summons Issued Electronically as to Judy Gilmore, Mark Nooth, Oregon Department of Corrections. NOTICE: Counsel shall print and serve the summonses and all documents issued by the Clerk at the time of filing upon all named parties in accordance with Local Rule 3-5. (sm) |
|
Filing 2 Proposed Summons to Oregon Department of Corrections (Attachments: #1 Proposed Summons Summons to Mark Nooth, #2 Proposed Summons Summons to Judy Gilmore) Filed by Betty L Knight. (Steinman, Dennis) |
Filing 1 Complaint. Filing fee in the amount of $400 collected. Agency Tracking ID: 0979-4464720 Jury Trial Requested: Yes. Filed by Betty L Knight against All Defendants (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet). (Steinman, Dennis) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Oregon District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.