Wells v. Nooth

Wells v. Nooth

Petitioner:	Leroy Lamont Wells
Respondent:	Mark Nooth
Case Number:	2:2016cv01606
Filed:	August 8, 2016
Court:	US District Court for the District of Oregon
Office:	Pendleton (2) Office
Presiding Judge:	Malcolm F. Marsh
Nature of Suit:	Prisoner Petitions: Habeas Corpus (General)
Cause of Action:	28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jury Demanded By:	None

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
October 31, 2016	Filing 25 Petitioner's Motion for Appointment of Counsel (ECF No. 23) is GRANTED. The Federal Public Defender, 101 S.W. Main, Suite 1700, Portland, Oregon 97204, is appointed to represent Petitioner in this proceeding. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Peti tioner, with the assistance of counsel, shall file an Amended Habeas Petition setting forth all of his grounds for relief and the facts supporting each ground. The Amended Petition shall be filed within sixty days of the date of this Order. This Co urt DENIES Petitioner's Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF No. 21 ). Upon receipt of Petitioner's Amended Petition, the Court will issue a Scheduling Order requiring Respondent to address the allegations of Petitioner's Amended Petition. Signed on 10/31/2016 by Judge Malcolm F. Marsh. (copy of order mailed to petitioner) (petition emailed to FPD) (kms)

Date Filed

Document Text

October 31, 2016

Filing 25 Petitioner's Motion for Appointment of Counsel (ECF No. 23) is GRANTED. The Federal Public Defender, 101 S.W. Main, Suite 1700, Portland, Oregon 97204, is appointed to represent Petitioner in this proceeding. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Peti tioner, with the assistance of counsel, shall file an Amended Habeas Petition setting forth all of his grounds for relief and the facts supporting each ground. The Amended Petition shall be filed within sixty days of the date of this Order. This Co urt DENIES Petitioner's Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF No. 21 ). Upon receipt of Petitioner's Amended Petition, the Court will issue a Scheduling Order requiring Respondent to address the allegations of Petitioner's Amended Petition. Signed on 10/31/2016 by Judge Malcolm F. Marsh. (copy of order mailed to petitioner) (petition emailed to FPD) (kms)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Oregon District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Wells v. Nooth
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Respondent: Mark Nooth
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Petitioner: Leroy Lamont Wells
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?