Snyder v. Stevens
Plaintiff: James F. Snyder
Defendant: Clayton Stevens
Case Number: 2:2017cv00352
Filed: March 2, 2017
Court: US District Court for the District of Oregon
Office: Pendleton (2) Office
Presiding Judge: Patricia Sullivan
Nature of Suit: Assault, Libel, and Slander
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
November 30, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 74 ORDER - The Court ADOPTS Magistrate Judge Sullivan's Findings and Recommendation, ECF 58 . The Court GRANTS defendant's motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim and for summary judgment, ECF 28 , DENIES defendant's motion for partial summary judgment as moot, ECF 52 , and DISMISSES this action. Signed on 11/30/2018 by Judge Michael H. Simon. (mja)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Oregon District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Snyder v. Stevens
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: James F. Snyder
Represented By: Thomas A. Ped
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Clayton Stevens
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?