Hollinquest v. Nichols et al

Hollinquest v. Nichols et al

Plaintiff:	Dasay Hollinquest
Defendant:	Russ Nichols et al
Case Number:	2:2017cv00797
Filed:	May 22, 2017
Court:	US District Court for the District of Oregon
Office:	Pendleton (2) Office
Presiding Judge:	John V. Acosta
Nature of Suit:	Prisoner: Civil Rights
Cause of Action:	42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jury Demanded By:	Plaintiff

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
September 30, 2019	Filing 79 OPINION AND ORDER: Upon review, I agree with Judge Acosta's recommendation and I ADOPT the F&R 68 in full. I GRANT Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment 52 on Claims One and Two, to the extent the motion is premised on the Eig hth Amendment, and DENY the Motion on all other grounds. I DISMISS without leave to amend both Claim Three of Plaintiffs Amended Complaint 8 and Plaintiffs retaliation claim. Signed on 9/30/19 by Judge Michael W. Mosman. (Mailed to Pro Se party on 9/30/19.) (dls)
June 19, 2017	Filing 5 ORDER TO DISMISS: IT IS ORDERED that Plaintiffs Complaint is DISMISSED. Plaintiff may file an Amended Complaint, curing the deficiencies noted above, within 30 days of the date of this order. Plaintiff is advised that failure to file an Amended Complaint shall result in the dismissal of this proceeding, with prejudice. Signed on 6/19/2017 by Judge Michael W. Mosman. (copy mailed to plaintiff) (kms)

Date Filed

Document Text

September 30, 2019

Filing 79 OPINION AND ORDER: Upon review, I agree with Judge Acosta's recommendation and I ADOPT the F&R 68 in full. I GRANT Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment 52 on Claims One and Two, to the extent the motion is premised on the Eig hth Amendment, and DENY the Motion on all other grounds. I DISMISS without leave to amend both Claim Three of Plaintiffs Amended Complaint 8 and Plaintiffs retaliation claim. Signed on 9/30/19 by Judge Michael W. Mosman. (Mailed to Pro Se party on 9/30/19.) (dls)

June 19, 2017

Filing 5 ORDER TO DISMISS: IT IS ORDERED that Plaintiffs Complaint is DISMISSED. Plaintiff may file an Amended Complaint, curing the deficiencies noted above, within 30 days of the date of this order. Plaintiff is advised that failure to file an Amended Complaint shall result in the dismissal of this proceeding, with prejudice. Signed on 6/19/2017 by Judge Michael W. Mosman. (copy mailed to plaintiff) (kms)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Oregon District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Hollinquest v. Nichols et al
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: Dasay Hollinquest
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: Russ Nichols et al
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?