Lee v. Taylor et al
| Kenneth Lee |
| Lance Albert, Dwight Hawkins, Dave Lilienthal, Ron Miles, Nina Sobotta and Jerri Taylor |
| 2:2017cv00822 |
| May 25, 2017 |
| US District Court for the District of Oregon |
| Pendleton (2) Office |
| John V. Acosta |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
84
ORDER - No party having made objections, this Court follows the recommendation of the Advisory Committee and reviews Judge Acosta's Findings and Recommendation for clear error on the face of the record. No such error is apparent. Accordi ngly, the Court ADOPTS Judge Acosta's Findings and Recommendation, ECF 82 . Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF 78 ) is GRANTED. This case is dismissed. Signed on 7/2/2020 by Judge Michael H. Simon. (Mailed to Pro Se party on 7/2/2020.) (mja)
|
|
Filing
57
ORDER - No party having made objections, this Court follows the recommendation of the Advisory Committee and reviews Magistrate Judge Acosta's Findings and Recommendation for clear error on the face of the record. No such error is apparent. Accordingly, the Court ADOPTS Magistrate Judge Acosta's Findings and Recommendation, ECF 55 . Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF 30 ) is DENIED. Signed 5/7/2019 by Judge Michael H. Simon. (mja)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Oregon District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
