Friends of Animals v. Pruitt, et al
Plaintiff: Friends of Animals
Defendant: Scott Pruitt and United States Environmental Protection Agency
Case Number: 2:2017cv01410
Filed: September 8, 2017
Court: US District Court for the District of Oregon
Office: Pendleton (2) Office
Presiding Judge: Patricia Sullivan
Nature of Suit: Environmental Matters
Cause of Action: 05 U.S.C. ยง 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
March 31, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 91 ORDER - The Court has reviewed de novo the Findings and Recommendation of U.S. Magistrate Judge Patricia Sullivan (ECF 79 ) and adopts the Findings and Recommendations. The Court concludes that EPA's decision not to initiate Special Re view for ZonaStat-H was arbitrary and capricious. Accordingly, the Court GRANTS Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF 41 ), DENIES Defendants and Defendant-Intervenor's Cross-Motions for Summary Judgment (ECF 42 , ECF 43 , and ECF 52 ), and VACATES AND REMANDS the decision of the EPA back to that agency for further proceedings consistent with Judge Sullivan's Findings and Recommendation. Signed on 3/31/2020 by Judge Michael H. Simon. (mja)
April 23, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 71 Opinion and Order - The Court declines to adopt the Findings and Recommendation (ECF 60 ). The case is remanded to Judge Sullivan for a determination on the merits of the parties' cross-motions for summary judgment. Signed on 4/23/2019 by Judge Michael H. Simon. (mja)
January 26, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 27 OPINION AND ORDER: HSUS meets Fed. R. Civ. P. 24(a)(2)s requirements and has established its entitlement to intervene as of right in this action. The Court GRANTS HSUS Motion to Intervene, subject to limitations. Signed on 1/26/18 by Magistrate Judge Patricia Sullivan. (See 8 page opinion for more information.) (dsg)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Oregon District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Friends of Animals v. Pruitt, et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Friends of Animals
Represented By: Michael Ray Harris
Represented By: R. Scott Jerger
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Scott Pruitt
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: United States Environmental Protection Agency
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?