Sanders v. Cain
Dean James Sanders |
Brad Cain |
Lynn David Larsen |
2:2017cv02001 |
December 15, 2017 |
US District Court for the District of Oregon |
Pendleton (2) Office |
Stacie F. Beckerman |
Prisoner Petitions: Habeas Corpus (General) |
28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State) |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 51 ORDER - No party having made objections, this Court follows the recommendation of the Advisory Committee and reviews Magistrate Judge Beckerman's Findings and Recommendation for clear error on the face of the record. No such error is app arent. Accordingly, the Court ADOPTS Magistrate Judge Beckerman's Findings and Recommendation, ECF 43 . Sanders' petition for writ of habeas corpus (ECF 1 ) is DENIED, and the Court issues a certificate of appealability only for Sanders' claim of ineffective assistance of counsel. Signed 6/24/2020 by Judge Michael H. Simon. (mja). |
Filing 45 ORDER - No party having made objections, this Court follows the recommendation of the Advisory Committee and reviews Magistrate Judge Beckerman's Findings and Recommendation for clear error on the face of the record. No such error is app arent. Accordingly, the Court ADOPTS Magistrate Judge Beckerman's Findings and Recommendation, ECF 43 . Sanders' petition for writ of habeas corpus (ECF 1 ) is DENIED, and the Court issues a certificate of appealability only for Sanders' claim of ineffective assistance of counsel. Signed on 6/8/2020 by Judge Michael H. Simon. (mja). |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Oregon District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.