Matthews v. Carey et al
| Daniel J. Matthews |
| B. Amsberry, Mitch Morrow, Kevin Brockcamp, CO J. Bircher, H. Nevil, Elizabeth Craig, CO U. Post, Cpt. T. Stewart, CO Pope, Sgt. Longhorn, CO Tester, CO White, CO Onstatt, Lt. Lindholm, Lt. Jackson, Greg Clark, Ms. Rangel, Birdie Janet Worley, Brian Belleque, Aaron O'Connor, CO S. King, J. Taylor, Yarbraugh, Colette Peters, Mr. Miles, J. Garton and Lt. Carey |
| 2:2018cv01618 |
| September 4, 2018 |
| US District Court for the District of Oregon |
| Stacie F Beckerman |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 27, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 4
Notice of Case Assignment: This case is assigned to Magistrate Judge Stacie F. Beckerman. (Mailed copy to plaintiff) (dsg)
|
|
Filing 3
Motion for Appointment of Counsel. Filed by Daniel J. Matthews. (dsg)
|
|
Filing 2
Complaint. Jury Trial Requested: Yes. In forma pauperis pending. Filed by Daniel J. Matthews against B. Amsberry, Brian Belleque, J. Bircher, Kevin Brockcamp, Carey, Greg Clark, Elizabeth Craig, J. Garton, Jackson, S. King, Lindholm, Longhorn, Miles, Mitch Morrow, H. Nevil, Aaron O'Connor, Onstatt, Colette Peters, Pope, U. Post, Rangel, T. Stewart, J. Taylor, Tester, White, Birdie Janet Worley, Yarbraugh (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibits). (dsg)
|
|
Filing 1
Application for Leave to Proceed IFP. Filed by Daniel J. Matthews. (dsg)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Oregon District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
