Sol v. Department of Corrections et al
| Tyler Sol |
| Central Trust and Department of Corrections |
| 2:2019cv00992 |
| June 24, 2019 |
| US District Court for the District of Oregon |
| Ann L Aiken |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 5, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 8 Motion to Amend. Filed by Tyler Sol. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Document 1, #2 Proposed Document 2) (dsg) |
| Filing 7 Motion for Extraordinary Expenses for Depositions of Expert Witnesses. Filed by Tyler Sol. (joha) |
| Filing 6 Exhibits. Filed by Tyler Sol. (joha) |
| Filing 5 Memorandum in support of Complaint #2 . Filed by Tyler Sol. (dsg) |
Filing 4
ORDER Denying Motion for Leave to Proceed in Forma Pauperis #1 . Filing and Administrative Fee must be paid within 30 days from the date of this order. Signed on 7/1/19 by Judge Ann L. Aiken. (Mailed to Pro Se party on 7/1/19.) (kf)
|
| Filing 3 Notice of Case Assignment: This case is assigned to Judge Ann L. Aiken. (Mailed to Pro Se party on 6/25/19.) (dsg) |
| Filing 2 Complaint. Jury Trial Requested: Yes. In forma pauperis pending. Filed by Tyler Sol against Central Trust, Department of Corrections (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet). (dsg) |
| Filing 1 Application for Leave to Proceed IFP. Filed by Tyler Sol. (dsg) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Oregon District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
