Rodriguez v. Cain et al
| Jonathan Jason Rodriguez |
| Brad Cain, Jane Doe, N. Main, Spriet, John Doe, Allison, James Eastwood and Joe Capps |
| 2:2020cv01581 |
| September 11, 2020 |
| U.S. District Court for the District of Oregon |
| John V Acosta |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 10, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 9 Notice of Lawsuit and Request for Waiver of Service of Summons. Waiver of Service is due by 11/20/2020. **4 PAGE(S), PRINT ALL**(Jonathan Rodriguez, Prisoner ID: 17349747) (Complaint #2 and this Notice Emailed to ODOJ on 10/21/2020.) (joha) |
Filing 8
ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR APPOINTMENT OF COUNSEL: The Court DENIES Plaintiff's Motion for Appointment of Counsel (ECF No. #3 ). Signed on 10/21/2020 by Magistrate Judge John V. Acosta. **2 PAGE(S), PRINT ALL**(Jonathan Rodriguez, Prisoner ID: 17349747) (joha)
|
|
Filing 7
ORDER TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS AND TO COLLECT INMATE FILING FEE: The court GRANTS plaintiff's Amended Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis (ECF No. #6 and FINDS MOOT plaintiff's original Application (ECF No. #1 ). IT IS ORDERED that the Oregon Department of Corrections, Central Trust Unit shall collect payments from Plaintiff's prison trust account and shall forward those payments to the Clerk of the Court in accordance with the formula set forth above until a total of $350.00 has been collected and forwarded to the Clerk of the Court. The payments shall be clearly identified by the name and number assigned to this action. The Clerk of the Court is directed to send a copy of this order to DOC - Central Trust, P.O. Box 14400, Salem, OR 97309. Signed on 10/21/2020 by Magistrate Judge John V. Acosta. **2 PAGE(S), PRINT ALL**(Jonathan Rodriguez, Prisoner ID: 17349747) (Mailed to DOC on 10/21/2020.) (joha)
|
| Filing 6 Amended Application for Leave to Proceed IFP. Filed by Jonathan Jason Rodriguez. **PRINT NEF ONLY**(Jonathan Rodriguez, Prisoner ID: 17349747) (joha) |
|
Filing 5
ORDER TO FILE AMENDED APPLICATION TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS: IT IS ORDERED that plaintiff must file an amended application curing the deficiency within 30 days of the date of this order. The amended application must bear the Civil No. 2:20-cv-01581-AC. Plaintiff is advised that failure to file an amended application will result in the dismissal of this proceeding. The Clerk of the Court is directed to send to Plaintiff a form Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis with this order. Signed on 10/1/2020 by Magistrate Judge John V. Acosta. (Attachments: #1 Amended Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis Form)**7 PAGE(S), PRINT ALL**(Jonathan Rodriguez, Prisoner ID: 17349747) (joha)
|
| Filing 4 Notice of Case Assignment: This case is assigned to Magistrate Judge John V. Acosta. **3 PAGE(S), PRINT ALL**(Jonathan Rodriguez, Prisoner ID: 17349747) (joha) |
| Filing 3 Motion for Appointment of Counsel. Filed by Jonathan Jason Rodriguez.**PRINT NEF ONLY**(Jonathan Rodriguez, Prisoner ID: 17349747) (joha) |
| Filing 2 Complaint. Filed by Jonathan Jason Rodriguez against Brad Cain (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Proposed Summonses).**PRINT NEF ONLY**(Jonathan Rodriguez, Prisoner ID: 17349747) (joha) |
| Filing 1 Application for Leave to Proceed IFP. Filed by Jonathan Jason Rodriguez.**PRINT NEF ONLY**(Jonathan Rodriguez, Prisoner ID: 17349747) (joha) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Oregon District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
