Evans v. Amsberry
Petitioner: Allan Ralph Evans
Respondent: Brigitte Amsberry
Case Number: 2:2021cv01164
Filed: August 9, 2021
Court: US District Court for the District of Oregon
Presiding Judge: Mark D Clarke
Nature of Suit: Prisoner Petitions: Habeas Corpus (General)
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on May 31, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
September 30, 2021 Filing 11 Notice of Attorney Substitution: Nicholas M. Kallstrom is substituted as counsel of record in place of Attorney Lynn David Larsen . Filed by Brigitte Amsberry. (Kallstrom, Nicholas)
September 21, 2021 Filing 10 Clerk's Notice of Mailing to Allan Ralph Evans regarding Case Assignment Notice #2 , Habeas Corpus Scheduling Order #3 , and Order #5 . (joha)
September 21, 2021 Filing 9 Notice of Change of Address. Filed by Allan Ralph Evans. (joha)
September 3, 2021 Filing 8 Mail Returned - Undeliverable: Order, #5 sent to ALLAN EVANS returned as undeliverable. (jkm)
September 3, 2021 Filing 7 Mail Returned - Undeliverable: Habeas Corpus Scheduling Order, #3 sent to ALLAN EVANS returned as undeliverable. (jkm)
August 25, 2021 Filing 6 Acceptance and Acknowledgment of Service of Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus and Scheduling Order upon the State Attorney General on behalf of Brigitte Amsberry. Filed by Brigitte Amsberry. (Larsen, Lynn)
August 24, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 5 Order : Petitioner to file a Notice of Change of Address by October 19, 2021. Petitioner is advised that failure to file a change of address will result in the dismissal of this proceeding for lack of prosecution. Signed on 8/24/2021 by Magistrate Judge Mark D. Clarke. (Deposited in outgoing mail to pro se party on 8/24/2021.) (jkm)
August 20, 2021 Filing 4 Mail Returned - Undeliverable: Case Assignment Notice #2 sent to Allan Ralph Evans. (Deposited in outgoing mail to pro se party on 8/10/2021.) (kgc)
August 20, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 3 Habeas Corpus Scheduling Order Serving Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus 2254 #1 on respondent. Answer is due by 10/19/2021. Signed on 8/20/2021 by Magistrate Judge Mark D. Clarke. (Attachments: #1 Attachment ACCEPTANCE, #2 Attachment PETITION)(Deposited in outgoing mail Order/Consent to pro se party on 8/20/2021.) (jkm)
August 10, 2021 Filing 2 Notice of Case Assignment: This case is assigned to Magistrate Judge Mark D. Clarke. (Deposited in outgoing mail to pro se party on 8/10/2021.) (joha)
August 9, 2021 Filing 1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (2254 - State) Filing Fee in amount of $5.00 collected. Receipt No. 94451 issued. Filed by Allan Ralph Evans against Brigitte Amsberry. (joha)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Oregon District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Evans v. Amsberry
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Allan Ralph Evans
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Brigitte Amsberry
Represented By: Lynn David Larsen
Represented By: Nicholas M. Kallstrom
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?