Tuttle v. Valkyrie House et al
| Josiah Tuttle |
| Valkyrie House, Patty Thomas and Andrew Thomas |
| 2:2022cv01026 |
| July 13, 2022 |
| US District Court for the District of Oregon |
| Andrew D Hallman |
| Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Employment |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Fed. Question |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 1, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 8 Summons Issued as to Valkyrie House. (Summons, USM 285 form(s), and copies of the Complaint and Order to Proceed in forma pauperis forwarded to the U.S. Marshals Service for service.) (dino) |
| Filing 7 Motion for Appointment of Counsel. Filed by Josiah Tuttle. (kgc) |
| Filing 6 Individual Party Consent to Jurisdiction by U.S. Magistrate Judge. (kgc) |
| Filing 5 Amended Civil Cover Sheet regarding Complaint #2 . Filed by Josiah Tuttle. (kgc) |
Filing 4
ORDER: Granting Motion for Leave to Proceed in Forma Pauperis #1 . Signed on 7/22/2022 by Magistrate Judge Andrew D. Hallman. (Deposited in outgoing mail to pro se party on 7/22/2022.) (dsg)
|
| Filing 3 Notice of Case Assignment: This case is assigned to Magistrate Judge Andrew D. Hallman. (Deposited in outgoing mail to pro se party on 7/15/2022.) (kgc) |
| Filing 2 Complaint. Jury Trial Requested: Yes. Filed by Josiah Tuttle against All Defendants ( #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Proposed Summons). (kgc) |
| Filing 1 Application for Leave to Proceed IFP. Filed by Josiah Tuttle. (kgc) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Oregon District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
