Hunt v. Baniteze
| Kenneth Eric Hunt |
| Sgt. Baniteze |
| 2:2022cv01037 |
| July 15, 2022 |
| U.S. District Court for the District of Oregon |
| Karin J Immergut |
| Prisoner Petitions: Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State) |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 9, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 6 NOTICE TO FILER: The Court received documents from you for filing through the U.S. Postal Service. Pursuant to Standing Orders 2019-7 and 2019-12, participation in the E-Filing Program is mandatory for all unrepresented inmate litigants incarcerated at Snake River Correctional Institution. Please comply by submitting documents to be filed with this Court to the library coordinator for scanning. **PRINT NEF ONLY**(Kenneth Hunt, Prisoner ID: 16645850) (sb) |
| Filing 5 Application for Leave to Proceed IFP. Filed by Kenneth Eric Hunt. (Attachments: #1 Trust Account Statement) **PRINT NEF ONLY** (Received via U.S. Postal Service.)(Kenneth Hunt, Prisoner ID: 16645850) (sb) |
Filing 4
ORDER: The Court ORDERS that Petitioner shall submit the remainder of the $350.00 filing fee (plus an addition $52.00 administrative fee) or file an Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis, within thirty days of the date of this order. The Court advises Petitioner that his failure to do so shall result in the dismissal of this proceeding. The Court DIRECTS the Clerk of Court to forward Petitioner a form Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis. Signed on 8/17/2022 by Judge Karin J. Immergut. (Attachments: #1 Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis)**8 PAGE(S), PRINT ALL**(Kenneth Hunt, Prisoner ID: 16645850) (sb)
|
| Filing 3 NOTICE TO FILER: The Court received documents from you for filing through the U.S. Postal Service. Pursuant to Standing Orders 2019-7 and 2019-12, participation in the E-Filing Program is mandatory for all unrepresented inmate litigants incarcerated at Snake River Correctional Institution. Please comply by submitting documents to be filed with this Court to the library coordinator for scanning. **PRINT NEF ONLY**(Kenneth Hunt, Prisoner ID: 16645850) (dsg) |
| Filing 2 Notice of Case Assignment: This case is assigned to Judge Karin J. Immergut. **3 PAGE(S), PRINT ALL**(Kenneth Hunt, Prisoner ID: 16645850) (dsg) |
| Filing 1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (2254 - State) Filing Fee in amount of $5.00 collected. Receipt No. 98782 issued. Filed by Kenneth Eric Hunt against Baniteze. (dsg) **PRINT NEF ONLY** (Kenneth Hunt, Prisoner ID: 16645850) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Oregon District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Hunt v. Baniteze | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: Kenneth Eric Hunt | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: Sgt. Baniteze | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
