Bradshaw v. Commissioner Social Security Administration
Joseph Rand Bradshaw |
Commissioner Social Security Administration |
2:2023cv00750 |
May 19, 2023 |
US District Court for the District of Oregon |
Michael H Simon |
Social Security: SSID Tit. XVI |
42 U.S.C. ยง 0405 g Review of Commissioner's Final Decision |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on April 16, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 9 Notice of Appearance of Justin Lane Martin appearing on behalf of Commissioner Social Security Administration. Filed by on behalf of Commissioner Social Security Administration. (Martin, Justin) |
Filing 8 ORDER: Granting D. James Tree's Motion for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice #7 . Ordered by Judge Michael H. Simon. (jp) |
Clerk's Review of Motion for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice. Pro Hac Vice admission requested by attorney D. James Tree. Filing fee in the amount of $300 collected; Agency Tracking ID: AORDC-8960878 #7 : Reviewed and Ready for Ruling. (ecp) |
Filing 7 Motion for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice. Pro Hac Vice admission requested by attorney D. James Tree. Filing fee in the amount of $300 collected; Agency Tracking ID: AORDC-8960878. Filed by Joseph Rand Bradshaw. (Tree, D.) |
Filing 6 Notice of Correction by Clerk regarding #1 Social Security Complaint. A Clerical error has been discovered in the case record: The case number on the PDF did not match the case in which it was filed. The following corrections were made to the record: A corrected PDF has been uploaded to replace the incorrect one. The Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) will be regenerated to all parties. (cw) |
Filing 5 Social Security Procedural Order and Notice of Case Assignment to Judge Michael H. Simon. Ordered by Judge Michael H. Simon. (ecp) |
Filing 4 ORDER - The Court GRANTS Plaintiff's Motion for Leave to Proceed in Forma Pauperis, ECF #2 . Ordered by Judge Michael H. Simon. (mja) |
Filing 3 Notice of Appearance of Kevin C. Danielson appearing on behalf of All Defendants . Filed by on behalf of All Defendants. (Danielson, Kevin) |
Filing 2 Application for Leave to Proceed IFP . Filed by Joseph Rand Bradshaw. (Halpern, Ari) |
Filing 1 Complaint to Review Final Decision of Commissioner (In forma pauperis status selected). Filed by Joseph Rand Bradshaw against Commissioner Social Security Administration Social Security Answer is due by 9/18/2023. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet). (Halpern, Ari) (Main Document 1 replaced on 5/23/2023) (cw). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Oregon District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Bradshaw v. Commissioner Social Security Administration | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Joseph Rand Bradshaw | |
Represented By: | Ari D. Halpern |
Represented By: | D. James Tree |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Commissioner Social Security Administration | |
Represented By: | Justin Lane Martin |
Represented By: | Kevin C. Danielson |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.