Harshman v. J-M Pipe Company, Inc. et al
| Tyson Harshman |
| J-M Pipe Company, Inc. and PW Eagle, Inc. |
| 2:2023cv01600 |
| October 31, 2023 |
| US District Court for the District of Oregon |
| Andrew D Hallman |
| Civil Rights: Employment |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship) |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 16, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 14 Declaration of Stephen M. Scott ISO Reply of Defendant JM Eagle's Motion to Compel Arbitration and to Dismiss or Stay Claims Pending Arbitration. Filed by J-M Pipe Company, Inc.. (Related document(s): Reply to Motion #13 .) (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2) (Scott, Stephen) |
| Filing 13 Reply to Motion to Compel Arbitration and to Dismiss or Stay Claims Pending Arbitration #5 Oral Argument Requested requested. Filed by J-M Pipe Company, Inc.. (Scott, Stephen) |
Filing 12
ORDER: Granting Motion for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply #11 . Reply is due by 12/18/2023. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Andrew D. Hallman. (dsg)
|
| Filing 11 Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time to File a Response/Reply [Reply] to Motion to Compel Arbitration and to Dismiss or Stay Claims Pending Arbitration #5 . Filed by J-M Pipe Company, Inc.. (Scott, Stephen) |
| Filing 10 Declaration of Tyson Harshman . Filed by Tyson Harshman. (Related document(s): Response to Motion #9 .) (Macke, William) |
| Filing 9 Response to Motion to Compel Arbitration and to Dismiss or Stay Claims Pending Arbitration #5 Oral Argument requested. Filed by Tyson Harshman. (Macke, William) |
|
Filing 8
ORDER: Granting Motion for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply #7 . Response is due by 12/1/2023. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Andrew D. Hallman. (dsg)
|
| Filing 7 Motion for Extension of Time to File a Response/Reply to Motion to Compel Arbitration and to Dismiss or Stay Claims Pending Arbitration #5 . Filed by Tyson Harshman. (Macke, William) |
| Filing 6 Declaration of Stephen M. Scott in Support of Motion to Compel Arbitration and to Dismiss or Stay Claims Pending Arbitration. Filed by J-M Pipe Company, Inc.. (Related document(s): Motion to Compel #5 .) (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2) (Scott, Stephen) |
| Filing 5 Motion to Compel Arbitration and to Dismiss or Stay Claims Pending Arbitration. Oral Argument requested. Filed by J-M Pipe Company, Inc.. (Scott, Stephen) |
|
Filing 4
Notice of Case Assignment to Magistrate Judge Andrew D. Hallman and Discovery and Pretrial Scheduling Order. Discovery is to be completed by 2/29/2024. Joint Alternate Dispute Resolution Report is due by 4/1/2024. Pretrial Order is due by 4/1/2024. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Andrew D. Hallman. (ecp)
|
| Filing 3 Corporate Disclosure Statement . Filed by J-M Pipe Company, Inc.. (Scott, Stephen) |
| Filing 2 Declaration of Stephen M. Scott in Support of Notice of Removal. Filed by J-M Pipe Company, Inc.. (Related document(s): Notice of Removal, #1 .) (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1 (State Court Pleadings), #2 Exhibit 2) (Scott, Stephen) |
| Filing 1 Notice of Removal of Case Number 23CV38502 from Umatilla County Circuit Court. Filing Fee in amount of $402 collected. Agency Tracking ID: AORDC-9136638 issued. Filer is subject to the requirements of Fed. R. Civ. P. 7.1.. Filed by J-M Pipe Company, Inc. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet). (Scott, Stephen) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Oregon District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
