Nelson v. Warren et al
| Phillip L. Nelson |
| Ernest Warren Jr. and Jason Steen |
| 2:2026cv00945 |
| May 11, 2026 |
| U.S. District Court for the District of Oregon |
| Michael J McShane |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on July 2, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 5
ORDER: Denying as moot Motion for Order to Merge #4 . The Court ordered that the filing fee in this case be applied to Case No. 3:26-cv-00858-AB and this case is now closed. Ordered by Judge Michael J. McShane. (Deposited in outgoing mail to pro se party on 7/2/2026.) (ps3)
|
| Filing 4 Plaintiff's Motion to Merge. Filed by Phillip L. Nelson. (jw) |
Filing 3
ORDER: The Clerk of the Court is HEREBY DIRECTED to apply the $405.00 filing fee that was applied in in this case to Case No. 3:26-cv-00858-AB. The Clerk of the Court is FURTHER DIRECTED to administratively close this action. Signed on 6/16/2026 by Judge Michael J. McShane. (Deposited in outgoing mail to pro se party on 6/16/2026.) (jw)
|
| Filing 2 Notice of Case Assignment: This case is assigned to Judge Michael J. McShane. (Deposited in outgoing mail to pro se party on 5/12/2026.) (jw) |
| Filing 1 Complaint. (No IFP Filed, No Filing Fee Paid) Jury Trial Requested: Yes. Filed by Phillip L. Nelson against All Defendants. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Proposed Summons). (jw) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Oregon District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.