Berry v. Gulick et al
| Thomas Leonard Berry |
| Garth Gulick, Joanna Boisvert, Ashley Clements and T. Pay |
| 2:2026cv01748 |
| August 20, 2026 |
| U.S. District Court for the District of Oregon |
| Michael J McShane |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 21, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 3 Notice of Case Assignment: This case is assigned to Judge Michael J. McShane. **3 PAGE(S), PRINT ALL**(Thomas Berry, Prisoner ID: 12166051) (kts) |
| NOTICE TO FILER: The Court received documents from you for filing through the U.S. Postal Service. Pursuant to Standing Orders 2019-7 and 2021-1, participation in the E-Filing Program is mandatory for all unrepresented inmate litigants incarcerated at Snake River Correctional Institution. Please comply by submitting documents to be filed with this Court to the library coordinator for scanning. Received via USPS. **PRINT NEF ONLY**(Thomas Berry, Prisoner ID: 12166051) (kts) |
| Filing 2 Application for Leave to Proceed IFP. Filed by Thomas Leonard Berry.**PRINT NEF ONLY**(Thomas Berry, Prisoner ID: 12166051) (kts) |
| Filing 1 Complaint. (IFP Submitted). Jury Trial Requested: No. Filed by Thomas Leonard Berry against All Defendants.**PRINT NEF ONLY**(Thomas Berry, Prisoner ID: 12166051) (kts) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Oregon District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
