Oregon Advocacy Center et al v. Mink et al
| 3:2002cv00339 |
| October 28, 2019 |
| US District Court for the District of Oregon |
| Portland (3) Office |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
485
OPINION AND ORDER: Amicus curiae Marion County's Motion to Expedite or Accelerate Ruling, ECF 479 , is GRANTED, and its Second Motion to Intervene, ECF 478 , is DENIED. Signed on 4/4/2024 by Judge Adrienne Nelson. Associated Cases: 3:02-cv-00339-AN, 3:21-cv-01637-AN. (joha)
|
|
Filing
475
Opinion and Order: For the foregoing reasons, Judge Broyles's order violates the Supremacy Clause. Defendants' Petition for Expedited Ruling on Supremacy Clause [ECF 460] is GRANTED. Signed on 3/6/2024 by Judge Michael W. Mosman. Associated Cases: 3:02-cv-00339-MO, 3:21-cv-01637-MO (kms)
|
|
Filing
452
Opinion and Order: Defendants' Petition for Expedited Ruling on Supremacy Clause [ECF 448] is GRANTED. Signed on 10/17/2023 by Judge Michael W. Mosman.Associated Cases: 3:02-cv-00339-MO, 3:21-cv-01637-MO (kms)
|
|
Filing
338
Opinion and Order: For the reasons stated on the record and above, I DENY Intervenors' Motion to Dissolve or Modify [ECF 284] the September 1 Order, with leave to renew. Signed on 1/9/2023 by Judge Michael W. Mosman.Associated Cases: 3:02-cv-00339-MO, 3:21-cv-01637-MO, 6:22-cv-01460-MO (kms)
|
|
Filing
271
ORDER TO IMPLEMENT NEUTRAL EXPERT'S RECOMMENDATIONS. See Order for further details. Signed on 9/1/2022 by Judge Michael W. Mosman. Associated Cases: 3:02-cv-00339-MO, 3:21-cv-01637-MO (joha)
|
|
Filing
256
OPINION AND ORDER: Defendant's Request for Judicial Notice [ECF 252 ] is GRANTED. I take judicial notice of the materials provided. Plaintiffs' Motion for Order to Implement Neutral Expert's Recommendations [ECF 253] is GRAN TED IN PART and DENIED IN PART. The Parties shall implement the recommendations in the Court's Neutral Expert's January and June 2022 reports. Dr. Pinals may grant extensions of other deadlines in her recommendations after conferring wit h the parties. Any such extensions shall be documented in Defendants' monthly progress reports. To the extent contempt proceedings arise out of the efforts state litigants are making in this case, I ENJOIN any action that seeks to hold those associated with this case in contempt for their efforts to comply with the permanent injunction. Signed on 8/16/2022 by Judge Michael W. Mosman. (joha) (Main Document 256 replaced on 8/16/2022) (cw).
|
|
Filing
147
OPINION AND ORDER: I DENY Plaintiffs' requests 134 to modify the injunction, hold a status hearing in six months, and be declared the prevailing party under 42 U.S.C. § 1988 and their Motion 140 for attorney fees. Signed on 10/28/19 by Judge Michael W. Mosman. (dls)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Oregon District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Oregon Advocacy Center et al v. Mink et al | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
