Echols v. KPMG, LLP
Plaintiff: William Echols
Defendant: KPMG, LLP
Case Number: 3:2003cv01223
Filed: September 9, 2003
Court: US District Court for the District of Oregon
Presiding Judge: Dennis J Hubel
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Employment
Cause of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family & Medical Leave Act
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on August 16, 2004. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
August 16, 2004 Filing 35 Judgment of Dismissal. Signed on 8/16/2004 by Judge Garr M. King. (ecp, )
August 13, 2004 Filing 34 Motion to Dismiss. Filed as Stipulated Notice of Dismissal with Prejudice. Filed by William Echols. (ljl, )
May 28, 2004 Opinion or Order Filing 33 RECORD OF ORDER by Judge Dennis J. Hubel: Parties having reported this matter has settled, the hearing set on June 1, 2004, on Defendant's Motion to Quash and Motion for Protective Order #28 is STRICKEN from the court's calendar and the motion is deemed MOOT. (kb, )
May 27, 2004 Opinion or Order Filing 32 RECORD OF ORDER by Judge Dennis J. Hubel: A telephone hearing is set on Defendant's Motion to Quash and Motion for Protective Order #28 on June 1, 2004, at 11:00 a.m. by telephone. The court will place the call. (kb, )
May 24, 2004 Filing 31 Affidavit of Richard C. Busse in Support of Plaintiff's Memorandum in Opposition to Defendant's Motion to Quash. Filed by William Echols. (mja, )
May 24, 2004 Filing 30 Memorandum in Opposition to Motion to Quash Defendant's Objections to Deposition Upon Written Questions, Motion for Protective Order, and Request for Hearing by Telephone #28 . Filed by William Echols.(mja, )
May 13, 2004 Filing 29 Declaration of Mark D. Temple in Support of Defendant's Objections to Depositions Upon Written Questions, Motion to Quash, Motion for Protective Order, and Request for Oral Hearing. Filed by KPMG, LLP. (Related document(s): Motion to Quash #28 .)(Walt, Jennifer)
May 13, 2004 Filing 28 Motion to Quash Defendant's Objections to Deposition Upon Written Questions, Motion for Protective Order, and Request for Hearing by Telephone. Filed by KPMG, LLP. (Walt, Jennifer)
May 11, 2004 Opinion or Order Filing 27 RECORD OF ORDER by Judge Dennis J. Hubel: Plaintiff's Motion to Extend Deadlines is GRANTED as follows: Fact Discovery to be completed by 7/9/04. A Joint ADR Report is due 7/16/04. Dispositive motions due 7/23/04. Expert discovery to be completed by 11/23/04. A Pretrial Order shall be lodged by 12/21/04. The 4-day jury trial, currently set to commence on 12/7/04, is RESET and will now commence on January 25, 2005, at 9:00 a.m. A pretrial conference will be set and a separate jury trial management order issued at a later date by the trial judge. (kb, )
May 5, 2004 Filing 26 Affidavit of Richard C. Busse. Filed by William Echols. (Related document(s): Motion for Extension of Time #25 .)(mja, )
May 5, 2004 Filing 25 Motion for Extension of Time to Extend Pretrial and Discovery Deadlines. Filed by William Echols. (mja, )
January 29, 2004 Filing 24 Notice Agreed Protective Order. Filed by KPMG, LLP. (Walt, Jennifer)
January 15, 2004 Opinion or Order Filing 23 CIVIL MINUTES:Record of ORDER by Judge Dennis J. Hubel: Parties tendered to the court a proposed agreed protective order, which the court will not enter for the following reason. The court will not approve stipulated blanket protective orders. Fed. R. Civ. P. 26; Foltz v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co., 331 F.3d 1122 (9th Cir. 2003). Any party seeking to protect the confidentiality of any document must make the requisite showing of good cause with respect to that document. For documents filed under seal, the party seeking protection must make an additional showing addressing the viability of redaction as an alternative to nondisclosure. The parties may resubmit a proposed protective order within fourteen (14) days of the date of this Order. (Related documents(s) #22 ) (kb, )
January 15, 2004 Filing 22 PROPOSED Agreed Protective Order submitted to the court by plaintiff and defendant (see following order). (kb, )
January 13, 2004 Filing 21 CIVIL MINUTES:Record of Rule 16 Conference held before Judge Dennis J. Hubel. ORDER - the parties' motions for extension of deadlines are granted. The following new case schedule is set: Fact Discovery to be completed by 5/7/2004. Joint Alternate Dispute Resolution Report due by 5/14/2004. Dispositive Motions due by 5/21/2004. Expert Discovery to be completed by 10/1/2004. Pretrial Order due by 11/2/2004. A 4-day Jury Trial is set on December 7, 2004, at 9:00 a.m. A pretrial conference will be set and a separate jury trial management order issued at a later date by the trial judge. Counsel Present for Plaintiff: Richard Busse. Counsel Present for Defendant: Mark Temple. Tape No: FTR. Court Reporter: KB. (kb, )
January 9, 2004 Filing 18 Notice Defendant's Corporate Disclosure Statement. Filed by KPMG, LLP. (Walt, Jennifer)
January 9, 2004 Filing 17 Proposed Form of Order Submitted of Agreed Protective Order. Filed by KPMG, LLP. (Walt, Jennifer)
January 2, 2004 Filing 16 Declaration of Mark D. Temple in Support of Defendant's Motion for Extension of the Deadlines Set by this Court's Discovery and Pretrial Scheduling Order; Request for Expedited Hearing. Filed by KPMG, LLP. (Related document(s) #13 ) (Walt, Jennifer)
January 2, 2004 Filing 15 Memorandum in Support of Points and Authorities; Request for Expedited Hearing. Filed by KPMG, LLP. (Related document(s) #13 ) (Walt, Jennifer)
January 2, 2004 Filing 14 Notice of Motion for Extension of Deadlines Set by the Court's Discovery and Pretrial Scheduling Order; Request for Expedited Hearing. Filed by KPMG, LLP. (Related document(s) #13 ) (Walt, Jennifer)
January 2, 2004 Filing 13 Motion for Extension of Discovery & PTO Deadlines Set by the Court's Discovery and Pretrial Scheduling Order; Request for Expedited Hearing. Filed by KPMG, LLP. (Walt, Jennifer)
December 30, 2003 Filing 20 Affidavit of Richard C. Busse in Support of Plaintiff's Unopposed Motion to Extend Pretrial and Discovery Deadlines. Filed by William Echols. (Related document(s) #19 ) (mja, )
December 30, 2003 Filing 19 Unopposed Motion for Extension of Discovery & PTO Deadlines. Filed by William Echols. (mja, )
December 12, 2003 Filing 12 Answer to Amended Complaint (Related Doc #11 ). Filed by KPMG, LLP. (Walt, Jennifer)
December 5, 2003 Filing 11 Amended Complaint Demand for Jury Trial (Wrongful Termination; Family Medical Leave Discrimination/Retaliation; Race Discrimination. Filed by William Echols against KPMG, LLP. (mja, )
December 4, 2003 Opinion or Order Filing 10 RECORD OF ORDER: Plaintiff's Unopposed Motion to File Amended Complaint (Related Doc #9 ) is GRANTED. Amended Complaint due 12/15/2003. by Judge Dennis J. Hubel. (kb, )
December 2, 2003 Filing 9 Unopposed Motion to Alter/Amend/Correct Complaint. Filed by William Echols. (mja, )
December 2, 2003 Opinion or Order Filing 8 CIVIL MINUTES:Record of Order by Judge Dennis J. Hubel: A Rule 16 Conference is set on January 13, 2004, at 10:30 a.m. by telephone. The court will place the call. Local Rules 16.2(b) and 26.1(a)(b) require that counsel confer prior to the conference. At the conference, counsel should be prepared to discuss the status of the case, relevant dates and deadlines, and any other significant issues. Plaintiff shall advise the court at the conference whether or not there will be full consent to proceed before magistrate judge in the case. If consents are going to be filed, it is helpful if they are filed prior to the time of the conference, particularly with respect to the setting of trial. (kb, )
November 25, 2003 Filing 7 Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(a)(1) Agreement. Filed by KPMG, LLP. (Walt, Jennifer)
November 3, 2003 Opinion or Order Filing 6 Order Granting Application for Special Admission Pro Hac Vice of Mark D. Temple for KPMG, LLP. Receipt number 453604 Signed 10/31/03 by Judge Dennis J. Hubel. (mja, )
October 16, 2003 Filing 5 Answer to Complaint (Related Doc #1 ). Filed by KPMG, LLP. (ljl, )
September 19, 2003 Filing 4 Return of Service Executed upon James D. Waler on 9/11/03. Filed by William Echols. (mja, )
September 19, 2003 Filing 3 Return of Service Executed upon David A. Kietzler on 9/11/03. Filed by William Echols. (mja, )
September 9, 2003 Filing 2 Discovery and Pretrial Scheduling Order and Notice of Case Assignment: Case assigned to the Honorable Dennis J. Hubel. Discovery to be completed by 1/6/2004. Joint Alternate Dispute Resolution Report due by 2/5/2004. Pretrial Order due by 2/5/2004. (mja, )
September 9, 2003 Filing 1 Complaint (Wrongful Termination; Family Medical Leave Discrimination/Retaliation; Race Discrimination) JURY TRIAL DEMANDED Filing Fee collected. Receipt #: David A. Dietzler (Partner) issued Summons issued as to 452679. Filed by William Echols against KPMG, LLP. (mja, )

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Oregon District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Echols v. KPMG, LLP
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: William Echols
Represented By: Richard C. Busse
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: KPMG, LLP
Represented By: Jennifer J. Walt
Represented By: Mark D. Temple
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?