Molony et al v. Crook County
3:2005cv01467 |
September 22, 2005 |
US District Court for the District of Oregon |
Portland Office |
Michael W. Mosman |
Civil Rights: Other |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 284 OPINION AND ORDER. For the foregoing reasons, I GRANT IN PART and DENY IN PART plaintiffs motion for supplemental judgment for attorney fees on remand 274 . Signed on 9/16/2011 by Judge Michael W. Mosman. (dls) |
Filing 256 ORDER: For the reasons given above, I GRANT IN PART and DENY IN PART plaintiff's request for attorney fees 220 . The overall request of $616,189 is reduced by (1) the fees sought between the end of the first pretrial conference and the start of the trial; (2) the fees sought for the Cabler litigation; and (3) a 15% reduction for excessive hours billed and overlapping, duplicative work. This results in a fee award in this case of $335,147.18, plus $7461.93 in no ntaxable expenses. I have also reviewed defendant's objections (#235) to plaintiff's bill of costs 225 . I find it appropriate, under the circumstances of this case, to allow costs for the Cabler transcript. Defendant's additional objections are denied and I find any costs billed during the interregnum to be de minimus. I GRANT plaintiff's costs in the amount of $14,102.24. Ordered by Judge Michael W. Mosman. (dls) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Oregon District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Molony et al v. Crook County | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.