Seiko Epson Corporation et al v. Glory South Software Manufacturing Inc. et al
| 3:2006cv00236 |
| February 17, 2006 |
| US District Court for the District of Oregon |
| Portland Office |
| Anna J. Brown |
| Patent |
| 35 U.S.C. ยง 271 Patent Infringement |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
524
Order by Judge Anna J. Brown. Finding of Personal Jurisdiction and Entry of Order of Default as to Butterfly Print Image Corp. LTD and Glory South Software Manufacturing Inc. Nunc pro tunc to 04/05/2012. Signed by Judge Anna J. Brown on 4/16/2012. (bb)
|
|
Filing
491
Order. The Court construes the term "being compressingly contained" in Claim 83 of Seiko Epson's '377 Patent is construed to mean "being contained in at least a partially compressed state." Signed on 12/16/2011 by Judge Anna J. Brown. (bb)
|
|
Filing
483
ORDER: The Court DENIES the Motion 351 for Partial Summary Judgment of Unenforceability of U.S. Patent Nos. 6,502,917 ('917 Patent) and 6,550,902 ('902 Patent) for Inequitable Conduct filed by Defendants Ninestar Technology Compan y, Ltd.; Ninestar Technology Co. Ltd; and Dataproducts USA, LLC, and GRANTS the Cross-Motion 370 for Partial Summary Judgment of No Inequitable Conduct or Walker Process Fraud filed by Plaintiffs Seiko Epson Corporation; Epson America, Inc.; and Epson Portland, Inc. Signed on 11/10/2011 by Judge Anna J. Brown. See 14 page Opinion and Order for full text. (bb)
|
|
Filing
479
Order regarding October 3, 2011 Continued Hearing on Motions for Summary Judgment and Ninestar's Motion to Amend its Answer. Signed on 10/26/2011 by Judge Anna J. Brown. (bb)
|
|
Filing
342
Order by Judge Anna J. Brown. No later than March 10, 2011, the parties shall file a joint statement which itemizes the dispositive motions each party anticipates filing, identifying the party or parties against whom the motion will be filed and the bases for such motion, all in a manner that makes evident any issues of law or fact that may be common to multiple motions. The Court will set a final dispositive motion schedule upon considering the March 10, 2011, Joint Statement. If any party believes a status conference is warranted before then, please contact Courtroom Deputy Bonnie Boyer to schedule one.See Order for full text. (bb)
|
|
Filing
335
Joint Stipulation between Plaintiffs and Abacus 24-7 LLC regarding authenticity of document productions. Signed on 12/21/2010 by Judge Anna J. Brown. (bb)
|
|
Filing
319
Opinion and Order. The Court GRANTS Plaintiff's Motion 307 for a Finding of Personal Jurisdiction and hereby issues an Order of Default against Defendant Zhuhai Gree Magneto-Electric Co., Ltd. Signed on 10/27/2010 by Judge Anna J. Brown. 11 page Opinion and Order attached. (bb)
|
|
Filing
249
Opinion and Order - The Court, in the exercise of its discretion, DENIES the Motion 233 of Defendants and Counterclaimants Ninestar Image Co., Ltd; Ninestar Technology Co., Ltd; Town Sky, Inc.; and DataProducts USA, LLC, forClarification and/or Modification of this Court's Opinion and Order entered on January 19, 2010. Signed on 3/10/2010 by Judge Anna J. Brown. (See formal Opinion and Order, 16-pages) (ecp)
|
|
Filing
231
OPINION AND ORDER: For these reasons, the Court, nunc pro tunc as of November 3, 2009, GRANTS Defendant Ninestar leave to file the Second Amended Answer and DISMISSES with prejudice all Counterclaims asserted in Ninestars First Amended Answer that Ninestar has not asserted in its Second Amended Answer. The Court also GRANTS Seiko Epsons Motion (#197) to Dismiss Ninestars Counterclaim based on sham antitrust litigation in violation of § 2 of the Sherman Act, DENIES Seiko Epsons Motion to Dismiss Ninestars Counterclaim based on Walker Process antitrust fraud in violation of § 2 of the Sherman Act, GRANTS Seiko Epsons Motion to Stay and Bifurcate Litigation of Ninestars Counterclaim based on Walker Process antitrust fraud, and GRANTS Seiko Epsons Motion to Dismiss Ninestars Counterclaim for Intentional Interference with Prospective Economic Advantage. 197 . Signed on 1/19/10 by Judge Anna J. Brown. (ljl)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Oregon District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Seiko Epson Corporation et al v. Glory South Software Manufacturing Inc. et al | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
