Alexander Manufacturing, Inc. Employee Stock Ownership Plan and Trust v. Illinois Union Insurance Co.
Case Number: 3:2006cv00735
Filed: May 22, 2006
Court: US District Court for the District of Oregon
Office: Portland Office
Presiding Judge: Paul Papak
Nature of Suit: Insurance
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Jury Demanded By: Defendant

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
February 22, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 141 OPINION & ORDER: Granting in Part and Denying in Part Plaintiff's Motion for Attorney Fees and Costs 129 . The Trust's bill of costs is denied with leave to file an amended bill of costs within one week of the date of this order. The Trust's motion for attorney fees is granted in part in the amount of $275,976.50. Signed on 2/22/10 by Magistrate Judge Paul Papak. (gm)
October 15, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 121 OPINION & ORDER: Illinois Union's Motions for Summary Judgment on the issue of no loss 54 , settlement without consent 57 , the fraudulent act exclusion 51 , and bad faith 48 are Denied. Illinois Union's Motion for Summary Judgment on the common claim endorsement 60 is Granted. The Trust's Cross-Motion for Summary Judgment on the bad faith claim 110 is Denied. Signed on 10/14/09 by Judge Paul Papak. (gm)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Oregon District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Alexander Manufacturing, Inc. Employee Stock Ownership Plan and Trust v. Illinois Union Insurance Co.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?