Traxler v. Multnomah County
Case Number: 3:2006cv01450
Filed: October 13, 2006
Court: US District Court for the District of Oregon
Office: Portland Office
Presiding Judge: Garr M. King
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Jobs
Cause of Action: 29 U.S.C. ยง 2601 Family & Medical Leave Act
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
September 22, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 177 Opinion and Order - Plaintiff's Motion for Attorney Fees and Costs 168 is GRANTED in PART in the amount of $10, 764. The Bill of Costs 173 is GRANTED in the amount of $192.12. Signed on 9/22/2010 by Judge Garr M. King. (mja)
August 2, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 167 Opinion and Order - The County did not present any evidence which persuades me that it had a good faith belief that there was reasonable grounds to think its management of Traxler did not violate the FMLA, particularly in light of the jury's fin dings. The County does not argue that it misunderstood its duties under the Act. Thus, after additional consideration, I find that Traxler is entitled to liquidated damages in the amount of $250,000 plus interest of 2.46% calculated from June 29, 2005 through July 1, 2008, the date of the Amended Judgment. Signed on 7/30/2010 by Judge Garr M. King. (mja)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Oregon District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Traxler v. Multnomah County
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?