Traxler v. Multnomah County
3:2006cv01450 |
October 13, 2006 |
US District Court for the District of Oregon |
Portland Office |
Garr M. King |
Civil Rights: Jobs |
29 U.S.C. ยง 2601 Family & Medical Leave Act |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 177 Opinion and Order - Plaintiff's Motion for Attorney Fees and Costs 168 is GRANTED in PART in the amount of $10, 764. The Bill of Costs 173 is GRANTED in the amount of $192.12. Signed on 9/22/2010 by Judge Garr M. King. (mja) |
Filing 167 Opinion and Order - The County did not present any evidence which persuades me that it had a good faith belief that there was reasonable grounds to think its management of Traxler did not violate the FMLA, particularly in light of the jury's fin dings. The County does not argue that it misunderstood its duties under the Act. Thus, after additional consideration, I find that Traxler is entitled to liquidated damages in the amount of $250,000 plus interest of 2.46% calculated from June 29, 2005 through July 1, 2008, the date of the Amended Judgment. Signed on 7/30/2010 by Judge Garr M. King. (mja) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Oregon District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Traxler v. Multnomah County | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.