Davis v. Hill

Davis v. Hill

Case Number:	3:2006cv01497
Filed:	October 23, 2006
Court:	US District Court for the District of Oregon
Office:	Portland Office
Presiding Judge:	John Jelderks
Nature of Suit:	Habeas Corpus (General)
Cause of Action:	28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jury Demanded By:	None

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
August 10, 2009	Filing 51 OPINION AND ORDER: Upon review, I agree with Judge Jelderks's recommendation, and I ADOPT the F&R 49 as my own opinion. Signed on 8/7/09 by Judge Michael W. Mosman. (dls)
July 7, 2009	Filing 49 FINDINGS & RECOMMENDATION: The Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (# 1 ) should be denied, and a judgment should be entered dismissing this case with prejudice. This recommendation is not an order that is immediately appealable to the N inth Circuit Court of Appeals. Any notice of appeal pursuant to Rule 4(a) (1), Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure, should not be filed until entry of the district court's judgment or appealable order. The parties shall have ten (10) days from the date of service of a copy of this recommendation within which to file specific written objections. Failure to timely file objections to any factual determinations of the Magistrate Judge will be considered a waiver of a party's right to de n ovo consideration of the factual issue, and will constitute a waiver of a party's right to appellate review of the findings of fact in an order or judgment entered pursuant to the Magistrate Judge's recommendation. Signed on July 2nd, 2009 by Magistrate Judge John Jelderks. (eo)

Date Filed

Document Text

August 10, 2009

Filing 51 OPINION AND ORDER: Upon review, I agree with Judge Jelderks's recommendation, and I ADOPT the F&R 49 as my own opinion. Signed on 8/7/09 by Judge Michael W. Mosman. (dls)

July 7, 2009

Filing 49 FINDINGS & RECOMMENDATION: The Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (# 1 ) should be denied, and a judgment should be entered dismissing this case with prejudice. This recommendation is not an order that is immediately appealable to the N inth Circuit Court of Appeals. Any notice of appeal pursuant to Rule 4(a) (1), Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure, should not be filed until entry of the district court's judgment or appealable order. The parties shall have ten (10) days from the date of service of a copy of this recommendation within which to file specific written objections. Failure to timely file objections to any factual determinations of the Magistrate Judge will be considered a waiver of a party's right to de n ovo consideration of the factual issue, and will constitute a waiver of a party's right to appellate review of the findings of fact in an order or judgment entered pursuant to the Magistrate Judge's recommendation. Signed on July 2nd, 2009 by Magistrate Judge John Jelderks. (eo)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Oregon District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Davis v. Hill
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?