The Learning Internet v. Learn.com, Inc.
| The Learning Internet |
| Learn.com, Inc. |
| Learn.com, Inc. |
| The Learning Internet |
| 3:2007cv00227 |
| February 16, 2007 |
| U.S. District Court for the District of Oregon |
| Portland Office |
| Multnomah |
| Donald C. Ashmanskas |
| Trademark |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1121 Trademark Infringement |
| Defendant |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
135
ORDER: (See 4 page order for details.) Signed on 3/17/10 by Judge Malcolm F. Marsh. (cib)
|
|
Filing
127
Findings & Recommendation: For the foregoing reasons, TLI's Motion for Partial Summary Judgment on Fraud Claims andCounterclaims (doc. #66) should be GRANTED, in part, and DENIED, in part. Specifically, TLI's request for judgment against LC I's Counterclaim V should be granted; and, TLI's request for judgment against LCI on Count 1 of TLI's Second Claim for Relief should be denied. TLI's Motionfor Partial Summary Judgment on Trademark Infringement Related Claims (doc . #77) should be GRANTED. Specifically, TLI's request for judgment against LCI on Count 1 of TLI's First Claim for Relief should be granted; and TLI's request for judgment against LCI's Counterclaims I, II, ill,IV and VI should be granted. TLI's Cross-Motion for Partial Summary Judgment that LCI's Marks are Descriptive (doc. #100) should be DENIED; and LCI's Motion for Summary Judgment that LCI's Marks are not Merely Descriptive (doc. #74) should be DENIED .The Findings and Recommendation will be referred to a district judge. Objections, if any, are due December 11,2009. If no objections are filed, then the Findings and Recommendation will go under advisement on that date.If objections are filed, then a response is due within 10 days after being served with a copy of the objections. When the response is due or filed, whichever date is earlier, the Findings and Recommendation will go under advisement. Objections to the Findings and Recommendation are due by 12/11/2009. Signed on 11/25/09 by Magistrate Judge John V. Acosta. (cib)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Oregon District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
