Sandau v. Wood et al
Plaintiff: Sherrie Carlson Sandau
Defendant: John A. Wood, Christopher Cass and City of Portland
Case Number: 3:2007cv00632
Filed: April 27, 2007
Court: US District Court for the District of Oregon
Office: Portland Office
County: Multnomah
Presiding Judge: Paul Papak
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Other
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
October 19, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 123 OPINION AND ORDER: Accordingly, I ADOPT Judge Papak's Findings and Recommendation 115 , 63 , 76 , and 86 . Ordered by Judge Michael W. Mosman. (dls)
September 1, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 115 Findings & Recommendation: I recommend that Sandau's motion 86 for leave to amend her complaint be granted, that City of Portland's and Cass's motion 63 for summary judgment and Wood's motion 76 for summary judgment be granted in part and denied in part as follows. Each dispositive motion should be granted as to Sandau's Section 1983 claim to the extent premised on Wood's initial entry into Sandau's home as to the individual defendants only, on qu alified immunity grounds; to the extent premised on Wood and Cass's use of force in effecting Sandau's arrest as to all defendants, on the ground that Sandau suffered no constitutional deprivation in connection with the officers' use o f force against her; to the extent premised on the manner of Sandau's detention as to defendant City of Portland only, on the ground that Sandau has not established the City's Monell liability in connection with the manner of her detention; and to the extent premised on the officers' entry into Sandau's home following Sandau's arrest, on the ground that Sandau suffered no constitutional deprivation in connection with that entry; and as to Sandau's common-law battery claim. The motions should otherwise each be denied. Objections to the Findings and Recommendation are due by 9/16/2009. Signed on 9/1/09 by Magistrate Judge Paul Papak. (gm)
February 6, 2008 Opinion or Order Filing 35 OPINION AND ORDER: Accordingly, with the above modifications, I ADOPT the magistrate judge's Findings & Recommendation 15 ; 24 . Signed on 2/6/08 by Judge Michael W. Mosman. (dls)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Oregon District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Sandau v. Wood et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: John A. Wood
Represented By: Mary T. Danford
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Christopher Cass
Represented By: Mary T. Danford
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: City of Portland
Represented By: Mary T. Danford
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Sherrie Carlson Sandau
Represented By: Judy Danelle Snyder
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?