Whitley v. City of Portland et al
| Nicole Whitley |
| City of Portland, Dave Famous, Robert Day, Oregon Department of Public Safety Standards and Training ("DPSST") and Cameron Campbell |
| 3:2007cv01114 |
| July 30, 2007 |
| US District Court for the District of Oregon |
| Portland Office |
| Multnomah |
| Anna J. Brown |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination) |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
230
Order on Plaintiff's Motion to Compel, # 198 . Signed on 1/15/2010 by Magistrate Judge John V. Acosta. (da)
|
|
Filing
183
ORDER - Adopting Findings and Recommendation 171 . IT IS SO ORDERED. Signed on 8/12/09 by Judge Malcolm F. Marsh. (peg)
|
|
Filing
171
Findings & Recommendation - Defendants' motions for summary judgment on Whitley's state and federal gender discrimination claims, wrongful discharge claim, and equal protection claim should be GRANTED, and Defendants' motion for summar y judgment on Whitley's federal and state retaliation claims and state whistleblower claim should be DENIED. Objections to the Findings and Recommendation are due by 6/4/2009. If objections are filed, a party may file a response to those objections within fourteen days of the filing date of the objections. Signed on 5/20/09, by Magistrate Judge John V. Acosta. (peg)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Oregon District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
