Otterson v. Federal Express Corporation et al
Plaintiff: Kevin Otterson
Defendant: Federal Express Corporation and Does 1-10
Case Number: 3:2007cv01274
Filed: August 23, 2007
Court: US District Court for the District of Oregon
Office: Portland Office
County: Multnomah
Presiding Judge: Paul Papak
Nature of Suit: Personal Property: Other
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 Petition for Removal- Property Damage
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
March 3, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 69 ORDER: Adopting the Magistrate's Findings and Recommendation 67 : Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment 32 is Granted and Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment 44 is Denied. Plaintiff's remaining claim is remanded to the Circuit Court of the State of Oregon, County of Multnomah, for further proceedings. Signed on 3/3/09 by Judge Ancer L. Haggerty. (gm)
January 28, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 67 Findings & Recommendation: Defendants FedEx and Kinko's Motion for Summary Judgment 32 should be granted, and Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment 44 should be denied. Otterson's implied federal common law cause of actio n for loss of goods shipped by interstate carrier should be dismissed as moot, and his express state-law claims for conversion and for negligent performance of bailment duties should be dismissed as preempted by federal law, to the extent pled agains t the named defendants in this action. The conversion claim pled against the Doe defendants should be remanded to the Circuit Court of the State of Oregon, County of Multnomah, for further proceedings. Objections to the Findings and Recommendation are due by 2/11/2009. Response to Objections to the Findings and Recommendation are due by 2/25/2009. Signed on 1/28/09 by Magistrate Judge Paul Papak. (gm)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Oregon District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Otterson v. Federal Express Corporation et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Kevin Otterson
Represented By: Lake James H Perriguey
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Federal Express Corporation
Represented By: Michael F. Van Hoomissen
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Does 1-10
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?