Dunnigan v. Commissioner, Social Security Administration
| Jim B. Dunnigan |
| Commissioner, Social Security Administration |
| 3:2007cv01645 |
| November 1, 2007 |
| US District Court for the District of Oregon |
| Portland Office |
| Multnomah |
| Donald C. Ashmanskas |
| Social Security: DIWC/DIWW |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC) |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
52
OPINION & ORDER: Adopting Findings and Recommendation 45 . Plaintiff's Motion for Attorney Fees is GRANTED IN PART and a 406(b)fee of $11,874.00 should be awarded to Mr. Graf. Signed on 3/16/10 by Judge Michael W. Mosman. (cib)
|
|
Filing
45
FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATION - Plaintiff's Amended Motion 36 for Attorney Fees Pursuant to 42 USC sec 406(g) should be GRANTED in part and a sec 406(g) fee of $11,874.00 should be awarded to Dunnigan's attorney. This matter will be referred to a district judge. Objections, if any, are due on or before 1/6/10. If objections are filed, a response is due within 14 days of being served with a copy of the objections. Signed on 12/23/09 by Magistrate Judge John V. Acosta. (peg)
|
|
Filing
32
ORDER FOR EAJA ATTORNEY FEES - Based upon Stipulation 30 the Court orders the Commissioner of Social Security Administration to pay EAJA attorney fees in the amount of $7,016.93, costs of $18.00 and expenses of $31.30 to Plaintiff in care of Plaintiff's attorney. Signed on 6/3/09 by Magistrate Judge John V. Acosta. (peg)
|
|
Filing
28
OPINION AND ORDER: On March 24, 2009, Magistrate Judge Acosta issued Findings and Recommendation ("F&R") (#25) in the above-captioned case recommending that I DENY the Commissioner's Motion to Remand for Further Administrative Proceedings 19 and REMAND the claim for an award of benefits. Upon review, I agree with Judge Acosta's recommendation, and I ADOPT the F&R 25 as my own opinion. Signed on 4/17/2009 by Judge Michael W. Mosman. (mjp)
|
|
Filing
25
Findings & Recommendation - The Commissioner's motion to remand for further administrative proceedings 19 should be denied. The court should remand the claim for an award of benefits. Objections to the Findings and Recommendation are due by 4/7/09. If objections are filed, a party may file a response within fourteen days of the filing date of the objections. Signed 3/24/09, US Magistrate Judge John V. Acosta. (peg)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Oregon District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Dunnigan v. Commissioner, Social Security Administration | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Jim B. Dunnigan | |
| Represented By: | Kimberly K. Tucker |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Commissioner, Social Security Administration | |
| Represented By: | Britannia I. Hobbs |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
