Gehring v. Board of Parole and Post Prison Supervision

Justia Dockets & Filings Ninth Circuit Oregon District Court Gehring v. Board of Parole and Post Prison Supervision

Gehring v. Board of Parole and Post Prison Supervision

Petitioner:	Kurt Dayton Gehring
Respondent:	Board of Parole and Post Prison Supervision
Case Number:	3:2007cv01686
Filed:	November 9, 2007
Court:	US District Court for the District of Oregon
Office:	Portland Office
County:	Marion
Presiding Judge:	Dennis J. Hubel
Nature of Suit:	Habeas Corpus (General)
Cause of Action:	28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jury Demanded By:	None

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
March 19, 2010	Filing 44 ORDER: Adopting Findings and Recommendation 41 . IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Amended Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus(#6)is denied and the case is dismissed. Signed on 3/19/10 by Judge Garr M. King. (cib)
February 9, 2010	Filing 41 FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATION - the Amended Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus should be DENIED, and a judgment of DISMISSAL should be entered. Should Petitioner appeal, a certificate of appealability should be DENIED as Petitioner has not made a subst antial showing of the denial of a constitutional right. Objections to the Findings and Recommendation are due by 2/23/2010. If objections are filed, a party may file a response to those objections within 14 days of service of a copy of the objections. This Findings is referred to US District Judge Garr M. King for review. Signed on 2/9/10 by Magistrate Judge John V. Acosta. (peg)

Date Filed

Document Text

March 19, 2010

Filing 44 ORDER: Adopting Findings and Recommendation 41 . IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Amended Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus(#6)is denied and the case is dismissed. Signed on 3/19/10 by Judge Garr M. King. (cib)

February 9, 2010

Filing 41 FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATION - the Amended Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus should be DENIED, and a judgment of DISMISSAL should be entered. Should Petitioner appeal, a certificate of appealability should be DENIED as Petitioner has not made a subst antial showing of the denial of a constitutional right. Objections to the Findings and Recommendation are due by 2/23/2010. If objections are filed, a party may file a response to those objections within 14 days of service of a copy of the objections. This Findings is referred to US District Judge Garr M. King for review. Signed on 2/9/10 by Magistrate Judge John V. Acosta. (peg)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Oregon District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Gehring v. Board of Parole and Post Prison Supervision
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Petitioner: Kurt Dayton Gehring
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Respondent: Board of Parole and Post Prison Supervision
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?