Padgett v. Kowanda et al
| Vincent Padgett |
| Anton Kowanda, Chris Schaefer, Scott Willis, Michelle Kessinger, Hubbard, Ruiz, Kolman, Nancy Howton, Troy Browser, Borello, Ogden, Carla Topou, Robin Wilkerson, Connelly, Cornell, Terry Gill and George Degner |
| 3:2008cv00087 |
| January 17, 2008 |
| U.S. District Court for the District of Oregon |
| Portland Office |
| Marion |
| Dennis J. Hubel |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
157
ORDER: Stipulated General Judgment of Dismissal. (Granting Motion for Judgment 156 .) Signed on 7/29/11 by Judge Ancer L. Haggerty. (kb)
|
|
Filing
138
ORDER: The Findings and Recommendation 126 is adopted in its entirety. Defendant's Objections are overruled, and defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment 91 is denied. Signed on 11/8/10 by Judge Ancer L. Haggerty. (jlr)
|
|
Filing
52
ORDER: The Findings and Recommendation 44 and the Amended Findings and Recommendation 48 is overruled in part as follows: defendants' motion to dimsiss 32 is granted as follows: all of the state claims are dismissed based on the OTCA's substitution provision and defendants' invocation of immunity related to the Eleventh Amendment of the United States Consitution. (see 6 page Order) Signed on 7/20/09 by Judge Ancer L. Haggerty. (ljl)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Oregon District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
