Rother v. Lupenko et al
Plaintiff: Lauren Rother
Defendant: Leslie Lupenko, Andrei Lupenko and Telelanguage Inc.
Case Number: 3:2008cv00161
Filed: February 7, 2008
Court: US District Court for the District of Oregon
Office: Portland (3) Office
County: Multnomah
Presiding Judge: Michael W. Mosman
Nature of Suit: Labor: Fair Standards
Cause of Action: 29 U.S.C. ยง 201 Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
August 13, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 378 OPINION AND ORDER: The Courts Supplemental Judgment 306 includes the remanded claims only. Plaintiffs Motion for Supplemental Attorney Fees 304 is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part. Plaintiffs are awarded $183,784.62 in attorney fees and costs. Signed on 8/13/14 by Judge Michael W. Mosman. (dls)
December 15, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 278 OPINION AND ORDER: Mr. Egans motion for supplemental fees 242 is GRANTED IN PART and he is awarded fees of $11,937.53, as well as costs of $128.60. Signed on 12/15/11 by Judge Michael W. Mosman. (dls)
August 1, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 236 OPINION AND ORDER: The plaintiffs Motion for Attorney Fees 231 is GRANTED in the amount of $129,746.80. Signed on 7/29/2011 by Judge Michael W. Mosman. (dls)
April 1, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 218 OPINION AND ORDER: For the reasons above, I DENY Defendants Renewed Motion for Judgment as a Matter of Law 202 as to their claims (1) that breaks of 2529 minutes are uncompensated lunch breaks, (2) that underpayments were de minimis, and (3) over whether there is a private right of action for being denied meal breaks. I GRANT Defendants Renewed Motion for Judgment as aMatter of Law 202 as to their claims that penalty wages are capped at 100 percent of unpaid wages and that Ms. Galtela nd was not entitled to penalty wages for her alleged minimum wage violation. I DENY AS MOOT the defendants claim that penalty wages were inconsistently calculated. I DENY Defendants Motion For A New Trial or Remittitur 202 . The parties are ORDERED to submit a revised judgment correctly calculating the judgment award in light of this Opinion and Order. Signed on 3/31/2011 by Judge Michael W. Mosman. (dls)
March 29, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 217 ORDER: For the foregoing reasons, I DENY Plaintiffs Motion to Attorney Fees 186 . Signed on 3/29/2011 by Judge Michael W. Mosman. (dls)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Oregon District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Rother v. Lupenko et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Lauren Rother
Represented By: Jon M. Egan
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Leslie Lupenko
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Andrei Lupenko
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Telelanguage Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?