David Hill Development, LLC v. City of Forest Grove et al
Plaintiff: David Hill Development, LLC
Defendant: City of Forest Grove, Steve A. Wood and Robert A. Foster
Case Number: 3:2008cv00266
Filed: March 4, 2008
Court: US District Court for the District of Oregon
Office: Portland Office
County: Washington
Presiding Judge: Donald C. Ashmanskas
Presiding Judge:
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Other
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jury Demanded By: Defendant

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
October 30, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 277 OPINION AND ORDER - Defendants' FRCP 50(b) Motion for Judgment as a Matter of Law and Alternative FRCP 59 Motion for New Trial 211 is GRANTED, in part, and DENIED, in part. The Jury's verdict in favor of David Hill's Takings-Exactions Claim is set aside and that claim is dismissed, without prejudice. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated this 30th day of October, 2012, by U.S. Magistrate Judge John V. Acosta. (peg)
February 29, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 267 OPINION and ORDER - Based upon the foregoing, Defendants' FRCP 59 and Alternative FRCP 60 Motion for New Trial Based on Evidence of Ex Parte Juror Contact 207 is DENIED. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dtaed this 29th day of February, 2012, by U.S. Magistrate Judge John V. Acosta. (peg)
September 1, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 151 ORDER ON DEFENDANTS' OBJECTIONS TO SPECIAL DAMAGES - Defendants' Objections(#137) to Plainitff's Itemized Statement of Damages are overruled. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated this 1st day of September, 2011, by U.S. Magistrate Judge John V. Acosta. (See attached order for full details.) (peg)
June 1, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 107 OPINION and ORDER - Defendants' Motion for Partial Summary Judgment 92 is DENIED. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated this 1st day of June, 2011, by U.S. Magistrate Judge John V. Acosta. (peg)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Oregon District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: David Hill Development, LLC v. City of Forest Grove et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: David Hill Development, LLC
Represented By: Steve C. Morasch
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: City of Forest Grove
Represented By: Richard J. Kuhn
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Steve A. Wood
Represented By: Richard J. Kuhn
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Robert A. Foster
Represented By: Richard J. Kuhn
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?