Evraz Oregon Steel Mills, Inc. v. Continental Insurance Company
| Evraz Oregon Steel Mills, Inc. |
| Continental Insurance Company |
| 3:2008cv00447 |
| April 10, 2008 |
| US District Court for the District of Oregon |
| Portland Office |
| Multnomah |
| John Jelderks |
| Insurance |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
439
OPINION and ORDER - Upon review, I agree with Judge Acosta's recommendation and I ADOPT the F&R 430 as my own opinion. The Motion 410 is GRANTED. The non-settling insurers will retain their equitable offset rights; the right to argue that th e Settlement Agreement, and the resulting contribution bar, is limited to the one occurrence at the Rivergate Site; and the right to enforcethe express terms of their excess insurance policies. IT IS SO ORDERED. DATED this 29th day of June, 2018, by Chief United States District Judge Michael W. Mosman. (peg)
|
|
Filing
382
OPINION AND ORDER: Upon review, I agree with Judge Acostas recommendation and I ADOPT the F&R 377 as my own opinion. Signed on 9/23/15 by Judge Michael W. Mosman. (dls)
|
|
Filing
360
OPINION and ORDER - Continental's Motion 334 to Compel is GRANTED. IT IS SO ORDERED. DATED this 28th day of July, 2014, by United States Magistrate Judge John V. Acosta. (peg)
|
|
Filing
305
OPINION and ORDER - For the reasons stated, Evraz's motion to consolidate 200 is DENIED without prejudice to Evraz's ability to move for selective consolidation of isolated motions. DATED this 3rd day of December, 2013, by United States Magistrate Judge John V. Acosta. (peg)
|
|
Filing
304
OPINION and ORDER - For the reasons stated, the court finds that Stoel Rives is not disqualified from representing Evraz in the present action under Or. RPC 1.7, 1.9, or 3.7. Evraz's motion 278 to withdraw and substitute counsel is GRANTED. IT IS SO ORDERED. DATED this 21st day of November, 2013, by United States Magistrate Judge John V. Acosta. (peg)
|
|
Filing
296
OPINION AND ORDER. Upon review, I agree with Judge Acostas recommendation, and I ADOPT the F&R 284 as my own opinion. Signed on 10/10/13 by Judge Michael W. Mosman. (dls)
|
|
Filing
120
OPINION AND ORDER: Upon review, I ADOPT Judge Jelderks F&R 104 as my own opinion, and I DENY the Motion for Partial Summary Judgment 82 . Signed on 3/29/2011 by Judge Michael W. Mosman. (dls)
|
|
Filing
74
OPINION AND ORDER: Upon review, I agree with Judge Jelderks's recommendation, and I ADOPT the F&R (#68) as my own opinion. Signed on 3/20/2009 by Judge Michael W. Mosman. (mjp)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Oregon District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Evraz Oregon Steel Mills, Inc. v. Continental Insurance Company | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Evraz Oregon Steel Mills, Inc. | |
| Represented By: | Kerry J. Shepherd |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Continental Insurance Company | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
