Daul et al v. PPM Energy, Inc.
Ty Daul and Raimond Grube |
PPM Energy, Inc. |
3:2008cv00524 |
May 1, 2008 |
US District Court for the District of Oregon |
Portland Office |
Multnomah |
John V. Acosta |
Labor: E.R.I.S.A. |
29 U.S.C. ยง 1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 156 OPINION and ORDER - Defendants' motion(#137) for attorneys' fees is DENIED. Dated this 7th day of March, 2011, by U.S. Magistrate Judge John V. Acosta. (peg) |
Filing 132 OPINION and ORDER - Plaintiffs' motion 117 to supplement, motion 119 to reconsider the December 14, 2009, summary judgment ruling, and motion 121 to reconsider the April 15, 2010, summary judgment ruling are all DENIED. Dated this 5th day of October, 2010, by US Magistrate Judge John V. Acosta. (peg) |
Filing 111 OPINION AND ORDER - Defendant's motion 93 for partial summary judgment on the AIP-based claims is GRANTED. Plaintiffs' motion for additional discovery is DENIED. Signed on 4/15/10 by Magistrate Judge John V. Acosta. (peg) |
Filing 59 OPINION AND ORDER - The Court finds that applicable standard for reviewing PPM's denial of benefits to Plaintiffs is de novo. Signed on 8/14/09 by Magistrate Judge John V. Acosta. (peg) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Oregon District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.