Varnal v. Oregon Lien Service, Inc.
Plaintiff: Patrick A. Varnal
Defendant: Oregon Lien Service, Inc.
Case Number: 3:2008cv00994
Filed: August 25, 2008
Court: US District Court for the District of Oregon
Office: Portland Office
County: Outside State
Presiding Judge: John V. Acosta
Nature of Suit: Contract: Marine
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Fed. Question: Breach of Contract
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
January 11, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 95 OPINION and ORDER - Varnal's motion 67 for partial summary judgment on his First, Second, Fourth and Sixth Claims for Relief is DENIED. Danish Marine's motion 61 for partial summary judgment on Varnal's Fifth Claim for Relief is GRANTED. Signed on 1/11/10 by Magistrate Judge John V. Acosta. (peg)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Oregon District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Varnal v. Oregon Lien Service, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Patrick A. Varnal
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Oregon Lien Service, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?